Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
The _Cho kêng lu_[133] refers to three minor wares which were regarded
as inferior to Kuan ware, and later writers have assumed that they
belonged to the same category. These are the Hsü wares, Yü-hang wares, and
_wu-ni_ wares. The first[134] is so little known that its identity has
been lost in variant readings, such as Hsün [Chinese] in later writers,
which is very near in appearance to _tung_ [Chinese], a common form used
for the Tung ware (see p. 82); and we can safely leave it until some
clearer information is forthcoming. The second, according to the _T´ao
lu_,[135] was a Sung ware made at Yü-hang Hsien, in the prefecture of
Hang Chou. "Its colour was like Kuan porcelain without its crackle, its
lustre (_jung_), and its unctuous richness (_jun_)." The _wu-ni_ ware is
dark-bodied earthenware, which is discussed on p. 133.
[Illustration:
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Plate 18.--Sung dynasty.
Fig. 1.--Bowl with engraved peony design under a brownish green celadon
glaze. Northern Chinese. Diameter 7¾ inches. _Eumorfopoulos Collection._
Fig. 2.--Vase moulded in form of a lotus flower, dark grey stoneware,
burnt reddish brown, milky grey glaze, closely crackled. Height 7 inches.
_Freer Collection._]
_Ko yao_ [Chinese]
_Ko yao_ (the elder brother's ware), or _Ko ko yao_, as it is sometimes
called with the first character repeated, is unanimously ranked by Chinese
writers with the Ju and Kuan wares. According to the traditional accounts,
it was first made by the elder of the two brothers Chang [Chinese],
who were potters of Lung-ch´üan Hsien in the Ch´u-chou Fu, province of
Chekiang, each having a separate factory in the Liu-t´ien district. Most
of the Chinese authorities are content to give the date of these brothers
as some time in the Sung dynasty, but one account[136] narrows the period
down to the Southern Sung (1127-1279 A.D.). Professor Hirth takes the
rationalistic view that the story of the brothers is a myth embodying the
fact that there were two distinct types of ware made in the Lung-ch´üan
district. Be this as it may, the Ko yao is of considerable interest to us
as forming a link between the obscure Ju and Kuan wares and the well-known
Lung-ch´üan celadon, approaching the latter in its grass green and sea
green varieties and the former in its most highly prized specimens of
bluish green or grey tones.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account