Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
It should be remembered, too, that at the time of which d'Entrecolles
speaks, an extensive use was being made at Ching-tê Chên of a beautiful
celadon glaze on a fine white porcelain body. These celadons of the period
will be discussed in their proper place, as they make no pretence of
antiquity and are easily distinguished by their pure white body and pale
soft green glaze. Indeed, they often have the ordinary white glaze under
the base and a period mark in blue.
Another factory which made free use of the celadon glaze was that of Yang
Chiang, province of Kuangtung. As a rule, the ware is recognisable by its
reddish brown stoneware body, but in cases where the biscuit is lighter in
colour and more porcellanous in texture, confusion may easily arise.
Nor must we forget the extensive manufacture of celadons outside China
itself. The Corean wares have already been mentioned. As a rule, their
soft velvety glaze is recognised by its peculiar bluish grey tone,
difficult to describe but easy to remember when once seen. The colour,
however, varies to distinctly greener and browner shades, which are liable
to be confused with Chinese celadons of the Lung-ch´üan and northern
types. Fortunately, most, though not all, of the Corean decorations are
very characteristic, particularly the delicate inlaid designs[176] in
white and black clays; and the finish of the ware underneath is usually
distinctive, a very low foot rim, the base slightly convex, and the
disfiguring presence of the sand, which in three little piles supported
the ware in the kiln.
There are, however, quite a number of ambiguous celadons with a brownish
green glaze, usually bowls, of which some are decorated inside with
beautiful carved and moulded designs of bold foliage (Plate 18, Fig. 1)
and even with the design of boys among flowering branches and the slight
combed patterns which are found on the Corean white wares. Were it not
for the apparently Chinese provenance of so many of these bowls, and the
absence of the Corean characteristics in their bases, one would be tempted
to class them as Corean on the strength of their general appearance.
Probably we have in this group both the Chinese prototypes and the close
imitations made by the Corean potters who followed these models just
as they followed the white ware of Ting Chou. One of the combed bowls
formerly treasured as a tea bowl in Japan is now in the Kunstgewerbe
Museum, Berlin, but unfortunately the Japanese name _shuko-yaki_, by
which Dr. Kümmel informs me it was known in Japan, sheds no light on the
question of its origin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account