Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
To return to the history of the period from which we digressed to
discuss the _lang yao_, the progress of the reviving industry suffered
a rude set-back between 1674–1678 when the Imperial factory was
destroyed during the rebellion of Wu San-kuei, viceroy of Yunnan. It
is improbable that up to this time any notable development had taken
place in the manufacture of porcelain, and those who think to flatter
a specimen by suggesting that it is “_very_ early K’ang Hsi” are likely
to be paying a doubtful compliment. When, however, peace was restored
and the factory rebuilt, a veritable renaissance of the porcelain
industry began. In 1680[269] an official of the Imperial household was
sent to reside at the factory and to superintend the work; and we are
told in the _T’ao shuo_[270] that “previously to this the first-class
workmen had been levied from the different districts of Jao Chou;
but now all this forced labour was stopped, and as each manufactory
was started the artisans were collected and materials provided, the
expenses being defrayed from the Imperial exchequer and the money paid
when due, in accordance with the market prices. Even the expenses for
carriage were not required from the different districts. None of the
proper duties of the local officers were interfered with; both the
officials and the common people enjoyed the benefit, and the processes
of manufacture were all much improved.”
The success of this new movement was assured by the appointment in
1682 of Ts’ang Ying-hsüan [chch 3] to the control of the Imperial
works. We are not told how long this distinguished person retained the
directorship, but his merits are clearly indicated in the encomiums
of a subsequent director, the celebrated T’ang Ying. In his “History
of the God of the Furnace Blast,” the latter states that when Ts’ang
was in charge of the factory the god laid his finger on the designs
and protected the porcelain in the kiln, so that it naturally came
out perfect. Unfortunately, the notice of Ts’ang’s work in the _T’ao
lu_[271] is in the conventional style, and extremely meagre. The earth
used, we are told, was unctuous, the material lustrous and thin. Every
kind of colour was made, but the snake-skin green (_shê p’i lü_), the
eel yellow (_shan yü huang_), the (?) turquoise ([chch 2] _chi ts’ui_),
and the “spotted yellow” ([chch 3] _huang pan tien_) were the most
beautiful. The monochrome (_chiao_)[272] yellow, the monochrome brown
or purple (_tzŭ_), the monochrome green, the _soufflé (ch’ui)_ red and
the _soufflé_ blue, were also beautiful. The Imperial factory under the
administration of T’ang-ying imitated these glaze colours.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account