Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
An interesting passage in the first letter[293] of Père d’Entrecolles
describes a curious kind of porcelain, of which the secret had already
been lost. It was known as _chia ch’ing_ or “blue put in press,”
and it was said that the blue designs on the cups so treated were
only visible when the vessel was filled with water. The method of
the manufacture is described as follows: “The porcelain to be so
decorated had to be very thin; when it was dry, a rather strong blue
was applied, not to the exterior in the usual manner, but on the
interior to the sides. The design usually consisted of fish, as being
specially appropriate to appear when the cup was filled with water.
When the colour was dry a light coating of slip, made with the body
material, was applied, and this coating enclosed the blue between
two layers of clay. When this coating was dry, glaze was sprinkled
inside the cup, and shortly afterwards the porcelain was placed on the
wheel. As the body had been strengthened on the interior, the potter
proceeded to pare it down outside as fine as possible without actually
penetrating to the colour. The exterior was then glazed by immersion.
When completely dry it was fired in the ordinary furnace. The work is
extremely delicate, and requires a dexterity which the Chinese seem no
longer to possess. Still, they try from time to time to recover the
secret of this magical painting, but without success. One of them told
me recently that he had made a fresh attempt, and had almost succeeded.”
No example of this mysterious porcelain is known to exist, and it is
probable that the whole story is based on some ill-grounded tradition.
It is true that water will bring out the faded design on certain old
potteries, but this is due to the action of the water in restoring
transparency to a soft decayed glaze. But how the water or any other
liquid could affect the transparency of a hard, impenetrable porcelain
glaze, still less influence the colour concealed beneath a layer of
clay and glaze, is far from clear. Indeed, the whole story savours of
the “tall tales” quoted in chap. x. of vol. i.
But perhaps it will not be inappropriate to mention here another
peculiar type of blue and white, which, if we may judge by the early
date mark usually placed upon it, throws back to some older model. The
design, usually a dragon, is delicately traced with a needle point on
the body of the ware, and a little cobalt blue is dusted into the
incisions.[294] The glaze is then applied, and when the piece is fired
and finished the dragon design appears faintly “tattooed” in pale blue.
The effect is light and delicate, but of small decorative value, and
the few examples which I have seen are redeemed from insignificance
by a peculiarly beautiful body of pure glassy porcelain. They bear an
apocryphal Ch’êng Hua mark, but evidently belong to the first half of
the eighteenth century, to the Yung Chêng, or perhaps the late K’ang
Hsi period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive