Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
In the third year of Hsien Fêng the T’ai p’ing rebels captured Ching-tê
Chên and burnt down the Imperial factory, which was not rebuilt till
1864. The potters themselves were killed or scattered; and, naturally,
marked examples of this reign are scarce. Such, however, as do exist
are of little account, and may be regarded as continuations of the Tao
Kuang manufacture. Bushell[478] mentions vases of good form painted
in soft colours with nine five-clawed dragons on a white background,
which is etched in the paste with scrolled waves, and a dinner service
of bowls, cups and saucer dishes painted in colours with processional
figures of the eighteen Lohan. And in the British Museum there is a
large globular bowl on a high foot painted with green dragon designs
and a bowl with medallions of lanterns and vases separated by lotus
ornament, neither of which are in any way different from the Tao Kuang
wares. No doubt a good deal of porcelain was made at the private
factories even during this troubled period, but the specimens which I
have seen are not worthy of description.
_T’ung Chih_ [chch 2] (1862–1873)
When the T’ai p’ing rebels had been expelled from the province of
Kiangsi by the celebrated viceroy, Li Hung-chang, in 1864, the Imperial
factory was rebuilt on the old lines by the new director, Ts’ai
Chin-ch’ing. In the same year a list of the porcelain forwarded to the
Emperor was drawn up, and it is published in the _Chiang hsi t’ung
chih_[479] immediately after Hsieh Min’s list. It consists mainly of
bowls, wine and tea cups, saucer dishes and plates classified as _yüan
ch’i_ (round ware), and a few vases under the general heading, _cho
ch’i_; and though there is little originality in the designs, lists of
this kind are so rare and so instructive that I have no hesitation in
giving it in full below, following Bushell’s[480] renderings in most
cases.
Actual examples of T’ung Chih porcelain are not inspiring. Those in
the British Museum include a covered bowl with coloured sprays in a
ground of red diaper; a bowl with enamelled sprays on a pale brown
(_tzŭ chin_) glaze; a saucer with dragons etched under a transparent
green glaze, the exterior in unglazed biscuit painted in black; a
cup with red dragons in a ground of black enamel and the cyclical
date 1868; a low, octagonal bowl with the Eight Trigrams in relief
outside, the interior of this and of the preceding specimen as well
being coated with blue green enamel; and a basin enamelled with the
Eight Ambassadors of the Tribes of Man. The most favourable specimen
of the ware in the same collection is a carefully painted wedding bowl
with canary yellow ground and medallions of appropriate symbols, the
peach-and dragon-headed staff of longevity, the double fish symbol
of conjugal felicity, and the group of pencil brush, cake of ink and
_ju-i_ sceptre forming the rebus _pi ting ju i_, “may things be as you
wish.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account