Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
55. Large bowls painted in colours with archaic phœnixes
(_k’uei fêng_) among flowers.
_Kuang Hsü_ [chch 2] (1875–1909)
Marked examples of this modern ware in the Franks Collection include a
saucer with coloured sprays in a cloudy pink enamel ground; a covered
cup with spout decorated in red with cartouches of seal characters
accompanied by translations in the ordinary script, and a dish with
blackthorn bough and pink blossoms in Tao Kuang style. In every case
the ware is coarse-grained and rough to the touch, while the glaze is
of the lustrous surface and “musliny” texture, which is characteristic
of the nineteenth century porcelains; and the painting is mechanical
and devoid of any distinction. There are two little saucers of better
quality both in material and painting, with stork and lotus designs in
mixed enamels and marks[483] which show that they are palace pieces
made for the Empress Dowager.
But the collector’s interest in Kuang Hsü porcelain is of a negative
kind. When it is frankly marked he sees and avoids it. But the Chinese
potters towards the close of the century evidently recovered some part
of the skill which the ravages of the T’ai p’ing rebels seemed to have
effectually dissipated; for they succeeded in making many excellent
_sang de bœuf_ reds and crackled emerald green monochromes which
have deceived collectors of experience. Even the best, however, of
these wares should be recognised by inferiority of form and material,
and in the case of red the fluescent glaze will be found in the modern
pieces to have overrun the foot rim, necessitating grinding of the base
rim. There are also fair imitations of the K’ang Hsi blue and white and
the enamelled vases of _famille verte_ or on-biscuit colours, and
even of the fine black and green grounds. But here again the inferior
biscuit, the lack of grace in the form and the stiffness of the designs
will be at once observed by the trained eye. When marked most of these
imitations have the _nien hao_ of K’ang Hsi, and this is almost
invariable on the modern blue and white.
There is, of course, a great quantity of modern porcelain, chiefly
enamelled and blue and white, made for the export trade and sold at
prices which compete successfully with those of the European wares.
It is chiefly in the style of the K’ang Hsi and Ch’ien Lung wares,
and is marked accordingly; but the ware is coarse-grained, and the
decorations summary, and there is no excuse for mistaking these obvious
reproductions for anything but what they are and, in fact, what they
pretend to be.
The brief reign of Hsüan T’ung [chch 2] (1909–1911) is a blank so
far as ceramic history is concerned; and with the fall of the Ch’ing
dynasty in 1912 the Imperial works ceased its activity, and it remains
to be seen whether Ching-tê Chên will again have the advantage of a
state factory to set a standard for the industry in general.
CHAPTER XVI
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account