Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
[210] Other saucers of this kind have a decoration of radiating floral
sprays, and there are bowls of a familiar type with small sprays
engraved and filled in with coloured glazes in a ground of green or
aubergine purple. Some of these have a rough biscuit suggesting the
late Ming period; others of finer finish apparently belong to the K’ang
Hsi period. They often have indistinct seal marks, known as “shop
marks,” in blue.
[211] _Burlington Magazine_, December, 1910, p. 169, and March,
1913, p. 311.
[212] Figured in Monkhouse, op. cit., Fig. 2. The date of the mount
is disputed, some authorities placing it at the end of the sixteenth
century.
[213] Figured by Perzynski, _Burlington Magazine_, March, 1913. A
vase of this style with tulip design in the palace at Charlottenburg
has a cyclical date in the decoration, which represents 1639 or 1699
(probably the former) in our chronology.
[214] [chch 3] _pai tun tzŭ_ white blocks.
[215] A sixteenth-century work. See p. 2.
[216] Many observers positively assert that the grooved foot rim does
not occur on pre-K’ang Hsi porcelain. If this is true, it provides a
very useful rule for dating; but the rigid application of these rules
of thumb is rarely possible, and we can only regard them as useful but
not infallible guides.
[217] Quoted in _T’ao lu_, bk. viii., fol. 6.
[218] _fu ti._
[219] _Man hsin._
[220] See _T’ao shuo_, bk. iii., fol. 7 verso. “Among other
things the porcelain with glaze lustrous and thick like massed lard,
and which has millet grains rising like chicken skin and displays palm
eyes (_tsung yen_) like orange skin, is prized.” The expression
“palm eyes” occurring by itself in other contexts has given rise to
conflicting opinions, but its use here, qualified by the comparison
with orange peel and in contrast with the granular elevations,
points clearly to some sort of depressions or pittings which, being
characteristic of the classical porcelain, came to be regarded as
beauty spots.
[221] e.g. The _P’ing shih_, the _P’ing hua p’u_, and the
_Chang wu chih_, all late Ming works. An extract from the second
(quoted in the _T’ao lu_, bk. ix., p. 4 verso) tells us that
“Chang Tê-ch’ien says all who arrange flowers first must choose vases.
For summer and autumn you should use porcelain vases. For the hall and
large rooms large vases are fitting; for the study, small ones. Avoid
circular arrangement and avoid pairs. Prize the porcelain and disdain
gold and silver. Esteem pure elegance. The mouth of the vase should be
small and the foot thick. Choose these. They stand firm, and do not
emit vapours.” Tin linings, we are also told, should be used in winter
to prevent the frost cracking the porcelain; and _Chang wu chih_
(quoted _ibidem_, fol. 6 verso) speaks of very large Lung-ch’üan
and Chün ware vases, two or three feet high, as very suitable for
putting old prunus boughs in.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account