Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
[286] There are frequent allusions to the European trade in the letters
of Père d’Entrecolles. In the first letter (Bushell, _T’ao shuo_,
p. 191) a reference is made among moulded porcelains to “celles qui
sont d’une figure bisarre, comme les animaux, les grotesques, les
Idoles, les bustes que les Europeans ordonnent.” On p. 193: “Pour
ce qui est des couleurs de la porcelaine, il y en a de toutes les
sortes. On n’en voit gueres en Europe que de celle qui est d’un bleu
vif sur un fond blanc. Je crois pourtant que nos Marchands y en ont
apporté d’autres.” On p. 202, to explain the high price of the Chinese
porcelain in Europe, we are told that for the porcelain for Europe new
models, often very strange and difficult to manufacture, are constantly
demanded, and as the porcelain was rejected for the smallest defect,
these pieces were left on the potter’s hands, and, being un-Chinese
in taste, were quite unsaleable. Naturally the potter demanded a high
price for the successful pieces to cover his loss on the rejected.
On the other hand, we are told (p. 204) that the mandarins,
recognising the inventive genius of the Europeans, sometimes asked
him (d’Entrecolles) to procure new and curious designs, in order that
they might have novelties to offer to the Emperor. But his converts
entreated him not to get these designs, which were often very difficult
to execute and led to all manner of ill-treatment of the unfortunate
workmen.
On the same page we are told that the European merchants ordered large
plaques for inlaying in furniture, but that the potters found it
impossible to make any plaque larger than about a foot square. In the
second letter (section x.), however, we learn that “this year (1722)
they had accepted orders for designs which had hitherto been considered
impossible, viz. for urns (_urnes_) 3 feet and more high, with a
cover which rose in pyramidal form to an additional foot. They were
made in three pieces, so skilfully joined that the seams were not
visible, and out of twenty-five made only eight had been successful.
These objects were ordered by the Canton merchants, who deal with the
Europeans; for in China people are not interested in porcelain which
entails such great cost.”
[287] This defect is noticed by Père d’Entrecolles, who mentions
another remedy used by the Chinese potters. They applied, he tells us
in section ii. of the second letter, a preparation of bamboo ashes
mixed with glazing material to the edges of the plate before the
glazing proper. This was supposed to have the desired effect without
impairing the whiteness of the porcelain.
[288] See p. 74.
[289] Second letter, section iv.
[290] See Bushell, O. C. A., p. 320.
[291] See p. 201.
[292] The use of crackle glaze over blue (_porcelaine toute
azurée_) is noted by Père d’Entrecolles in his first letter. See
Bushell, op. cit., p. 195.
[293] See Bushell, _T’ao shuo_, p. 197.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account