Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
[359] White was also used in the worship of the Year Star (Jupiter).
Other colours which have a ritual significance are _yellow_, used
in the Ancestral Temple by the Emperor, and on the altars of the god
of Agriculture and of the goddess of Silk; _blue_, in the Temple
of Heaven and in the Temple of Land and Grain; and _red_, in the
worship of the Sun.
[360] Brinkley has aptly described it as “snow-white oil.”
[361] Cf. Père d’Entrecolles, second letter, section xviii.: “(The
designs) are first outlined with a graving-tool on the body of the
vase, and afterwards lightly channelled around to give them relief.
After this they are glazed.”
[362] See d’Entrecolles, loc. cit., sections iv. and v. After
describing the preparation of the steatite (_hua shih_) by mixing
it with water, he continues: “Then they dip a brush in the mixture and
trace various designs on the porcelain, and when they are dry the glaze
is applied. When the ware is fired, these designs emerge in a white
which differs from that of the body. It is as though a faint mist had
spread over the surface. The white from _hoa che_ (_hua shih_
or _steatite_) is called ivory white, _siam ya pe_ (_hsiang
ya pai_).” In the next section he describes another material used
for white painting under the glaze. This is _shih kao_, which has
been identified with fibrous gypsum.
[363] See p. 74.
[364] First letter, Bushell, op. cit., p. 195.
[365] _O. C. A._, p. 533.
[366] _Ku chin t’u shu_, section xxxii., vol. 248, fol. 15. In
this way, we are told, were produced (1) the thousandfold millet
crackle and (2) the drab-brown (_ho_) cups. The colour of the
latter was obtained by rubbing on a decoction of old tea leaves. The
former is a name given to a glaze broken into “numerous small points.”
[367] See Bushell, _T’ao shuo_, loc. cit., p. 195.
[368] The _Tao lu_ (see Julien, p. 214) informs us that the _sui
ch’i yu_ (crackle ware glaze) was made from briquettes formed of the
natural rock of San-pao-p’êng. If highly refined this material produced
small crackle; if less carefully refined, coarse crackle. In reference
to _sui ch’i_ in an earlier part of the same work, we are told
that the Sung potters mixed _hua shih_ with the glaze to produce
crackle. _Hua shih_ is a material of the nature of steatite, and
Bushell (_O. C. A._, p. 447) states that the Chinese potters mix
powdered steatite with the glaze to make it crackle. It is, then,
highly probable that the “white pebbles” of Père d’Entrecolles and the
rock of San-pao-p’êng are the same material and of a steatitic nature.
[369] [chch 3]. Another name of this official, _Yen kung_, is
mentioned in the _T’ao lu_, bk. v., fol. 11 verso.
[370] Situated at the junction of the Grand Canal and the Yangtze.
[371] Loc. cit.
[372] Silvering the entire surface (_mo yin_), as opposed to
merely decorating with painted designs in silver (_miao yin_),
appears to have been a novelty introduced by T’ang Ying.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account