Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
We read in the _T’ao shuo_[142] that the Imperial factory was
re-established in the sixth year of this reign (1572), and placed under
the care of the assistant prefects of the district. This would seem to
imply that for the greater part of this brief period the Imperial works
had been in abeyance. Be this as it may, there was no falling off in
the quantity of porcelain commanded for the Court, and the extravagant
and burdensome demands evoked a protest from Hsü Ch’ih, the president
of the Censorate,[143] in 1571. It was urged among other things that
the secret of the copper red colour (_hsien hung_) had been lost,
and that the potters should be allowed to use the iron red (_fan
hung_) in its place: that the size and form of the large fish bowls
which were ordered made their manufacture almost impossible: that
the designs for the polychrome (_wu ts’ai_) painting were too
elaborate, and that square boxes made in three tiers were a novelty
difficult to construct. Fire and flood had devastated Ching-tê Chên,
and many of the workmen had fled, and he (the president) begged that a
large reduction should be made in the palace orders.
We are not told whether this memorial to the emperor had the desired
effect. In the case of the next emperor a similar protest resulted in
a large reduction of the demands. But the document discloses several
interesting facts, and among other things we learn that the designs for
some of the ware and for the coloured decoration were still sent from
the palace as in the days of Ch’êng Hua.
The official lists of porcelain actually supplied to the Court of Lung
Ch’ing have been briefly summarised in the _T’ao shuo_[144];
but they do not include any new forms, and the motives of decoration
were in the main similar to those recorded in the Chia Ching lists.
The following, however, may be added to the summary in the previous
chapter:--
The _yü tsan hua_, rendered in Giles’s Dictionary as the “tuberose,” by
Bushell as the “iris.”
Clumps of chrysanthemum flowers.
Interlacing scrolls of _mu-tan_ peony.
_Ch’ang ch’un_ (long spring) flowers, identified by Bushell with the
“jasmine.”
A “joyous meeting,” symbolised according to Bushell by a pair of
magpies.
The Tartar pheasant (_chai chih_).
The season flowers supporting the characters [chch 4] _ch’ien k’un
ch’ing t’ai_, “Heaven and earth fair and fruitful!”
Monsters (_shou_) in sea waves.
Flying fish.
Historical scenes (_ku shih_), as well as genre subjects (_jên wu_).
Children playing with branches of flowers.
This last design occurs both in the form of belts of foliage scrolls,
among which are semi-nude boys, and of medallions with a boy holding a
branch, on blue and white and polychrome wares of the late Ming period.
But it is a design of considerable antiquity, and it is found engraved
on the early Corean bowls which, no doubt, borrowed from Sung originals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account