Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
“Distinguish porcelain by the vessel’s foot. The Yung Lo
'press-hand’ bowls have a glazed bottom but a sandy foot;
Hsüan ware altar cups have 'cauldron’[218] bottom (i.e. convex
beneath) and wire-like foot; Chia Ching ware flat cups decorated
with fish have a 'loaf’ centre[219] (i.e. convex inside) and
rounded foot. All porcelain vessels issue from the kiln with
bottoms and feet which can testify to the fashion of the firing.”
It is not always easy unaided by illustration to interpret the Chinese
metaphors, but it is a matter of observation that many of the Sung
bowls, for instance, have a conical finish under the base, and that the
same pointed finish appears on some of the early Ming types, such as
the red bowls with Yung Lo mark. The “loaf centre” of the Chia Ching
bowls seems to refer to the convexity described on p. 35. The blue and
white conical bowls with Yung Lo mark (see p. 6) have, as a rule, a
small glazed base and a relatively wide unglazed foot rim.
But this digression on the nether peculiarities of the different wares
has led us away from the subject of glaze. The proverbial thickness and
solidity of the early Ming glazes, which are likened to “massed lard,”
are due to the piling up of successive coatings of glaze to ensure a
perfect covering for the body, and the same process was responsible
for the undulating appearance of the surface, which rose up in small
rounded elevations “like grains of millet” and displayed corresponding
depressions.[220] This uneven effect, due to an excess of glaze, was
much prized by the Chinese connoisseurs, who gave it descriptive
names like “millet markings,” “chicken skin,” or “orange peel,” and
the potters of later periods imitated it freely and often to excess.
Porcelain glazes are rarely dead white, and, speaking generally, it
may be said that the qualifying tint in the Ming period was greenish.
Indeed, this is the prevailing tone of Chinese glazes, but it is
perhaps accentuated by the thickness of the Ming glaze. This greenish
tinge is most noticeable when the ware is ornamented with delicate
traceries in pure white clay or slip under the glaze.
[Illustration: PLATE 84
Vase of baluster form with small mouth (_mei p’ing_).
Porcelain with coloured glazes on the biscuit, the designs
outlined in slender fillets of clay. A meeting of sages in a
landscape beneath an ancient pine tree, the design above their
heads representing the mountain mist. On the shoulders are large
_ju-i_ shaped lappets enclosing lotus sprays, with pendent
jewels between: fungus (_ling chih_) designs on the neck.
Yellow glaze under the base. A late example of this style of
ware, probably seventeenth century.
Height 11 inches.
_Salting Collection_ (_Victoria and Albert Museum_).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account