Christopher Crayon's Recollections: The Life and Times of the late James Ewing Ritchie as told by himselfRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
Christopher Crayon's Recollections: The Life and Times of the late James Ewing Ritchie as told by himself
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing), 1820-1898
As the season of the May Meetings draws near, one naturally thinks of
Exeter Hall and its interesting associations. When I first came to
London it had not long been open, and it was a wonder to the young man
from the country to see its capacious interior and its immense platform
crowded in every part. It had a much less gorgeous interior than now,
but its capacities for stowing away a large audience still remains the
same; and then, as now, it was available alike for Churchmen and
Dissenters to plead the claims of the great religious societies, but it
seems to me that the audiences were larger and more enthusiastic at that
early date, though I know not that the oratory was better. Bishops on
the platform were rare, and the principal performer in that line was
Bishop Stanley, of Norwich, a grotesque-looking little man, but not so
famous as his distinguished son, the Dean of Westminster. Leading
Evangelical ministers from the country—such as James, of Birmingham, who
had a very pathetic voice, and Hugh McNeile, of Liverpool, an Irishman,
with all an Irishman’s exuberance of gesture and of language—were a great
feature. At times the crowds were so great that a meeting had to be
improvised in the Lower Hall, then a much darker hall than it is now, but
which, at any rate, answered its end for the time being. The missionary
meetings were the chief attraction. Proceedings commenced early, and
were protracted far into the afternoon; but the audience remained to the
last, the ladies knitting assiduously all the while the report was being
read, and only leaving off to listen when the speaking began. Perhaps
the most crowded meeting ever held there—at any rate, in my time—was when
Prince Albert took the chair to inaugurate Sir Fowell Buxton’s grand, but
unfortunate, scheme for the opening up of the Congo. He spoke in a low
tone, and with a somewhat foreign accent. Bishop Wilberforce’s oratory
on that occasion was overpowering; the Prince’s eyes were rivetted on him
all the while. Sir Robert Peel spoke in a calm, dignified, statesmanlike
manner, but the expression of his face was too supercilious to be
pleasing. And there was Daniel O’Connell—big, burly, rollicking—who
seemed to enjoy the triumph of his own presence, though not permitted to
speak. The other time when I remember an awful crush at Exeter Hall was
at an anti-slavery meeting, when Lord Brougham took the chair; an M.P.
dared to attack his lordship, and his reply was crushing, his long nose
twitching all the while with a passion he was unable to repress. He
looked as angry as he felt. Amongst the missionaries, the most popular
speakers were John Williams, the martyr of Erromanga, and William Knibb,
the famous Baptist missionary from Jamaica, and Livingstone’s
father-in-law, the venerable Dr. Moffat, who, once upon his legs, seemed
as if he could never sit down again. Williams was a heavy man in
appearance, but of such evident goodness and earnestness that you were
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account