Christopher Quarles: College Professor and Master DetectiveBrebner, Percy James
General
Christopher Quarles: College Professor and Master Detective
Brebner, Percy James
College teachers -- Fiction; Detective and mystery stories
"Zena from the first suggested that we must find Frederick Ewing,"
said Quarles; "and her intuition was right. We know--at least I think
we may take it as an established fact--that a very expert gang has
been at work in London during the past few months, and it was
reasonable to assume that this robbery was their work, with the help
of someone connected with the bank. Practically speaking, it would
have been impossible without inside and absolutely accurate
information. A process of elimination left Ewing as the likely person
to give this help. We need not go over all the difficulties the gang
would have to contend with; they were many, not the least being the
successful removal of the spoil; but I asked myself whether this gang
was not a sort of obsession with us, whether the robbery might not
have been a one-man job. You will remember I questioned the general
manager on the possibility of Ewing being alone in the strong-rooms,
and whether the gold might not have been removed by degrees. He
laughed at the idea, but ridicule never yet made me give up a theory.
I looked for something to support my theory, and I found many things.
The action of the explosive had been peculiar. The manner of the
damage was not quite what one would have expected from gelignite, or
some equally powerful preparation. Further, why was Coulsdon found in
the outer safe? It is reasonable to suppose that he was rendered
insensible before the explosion took place, or he might have heard it.
Why, then, should he be dragged into the safe? A gang would not have
troubled to do this, but, if the job were a one-man affair, the thief
might reasonably want to keep his eye upon the porter in case he
should recover consciousness. Now, to come back to the explosion, it
seemed to me that so far as the door of the inner strong-room was
concerned it had not been locked, at any rate not fully locked, when
the explosion took place. Was there any support to this theory to be
found? Yes. I will show you presently the debris I picked out of the
lock. It contains portions--small, but quite recognizable--of a key,
not polished, as would be the case if used constantly, but rough. This
suggested that duplicate keys had been made. That key, Wigan, I
believe, was in the lock when the explosion took place. It was blown
to pieces by the explosion, but the burglar must have discovered his
mistake, and gathered up the pieces, for I could discover nothing
either on the strong-room floor or in the passage without. I found
another support to my theory in the window on the roof. Someone had
got out as well as in--got out, Wigan, to hide, and got in again when
the moment for action had come."
"But----"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account