Chronicles of an Old Inn; Or, A Few Words about Gray's InnHope, Andrée
History
Chronicles of an Old Inn; Or, A Few Words about Gray's Inn
Hope, Andrée
Gray's Inn; Inns of Court; Lawyers -- Great Britain
This historian relates that the Duke of Norfolk came to sup at
Winchester House, but that Gardiner would not sit down at table until
the messenger from Oxford had arrived to say the sacrifice of the
martyrs had been consummated.
As he joyed over the narrative of their sufferings, the hand of Heaven
fell heavily upon him, and he died soon afterwards in inexpressible
anguish of body and mind.
Other biographers say but little of the malady to which he succumbed,
but Fox's account is clearly incorrect in many particulars. The
Duke of Norfolk Fox alludes to, had been dead some thirteen months,
and Gardiner made a speech in Parliament more than a week after the
execution of these Bishops.
It is also a disputed point whether Gardiner really exhibited
vindictive eagerness in bringing about the deaths of Latimer and
Ridley, or whether, as some say, he endeavoured to save them, straining
indeed his authority by offering Latimer a pardon without the knowledge
of the Queen or the Council.
Bell, as well as Fox, declares that his death was a judgment brought
on him for his cruelty to these martyrs, but Dr. Godwin, Bishop of
Hereford, Dr. Fuller, and Archbishop Parker, all ascribe his death to
natural causes.
For some years Gardiner had suffered from rheumatic gout, and
ultimately consumption of the lungs was joined to his other diseases.
Whatever may have been his bodily ailments, it is agreed by every
writer that his latter days were embittered by remorse and mental
distress. The consciousness of his many sins of omission and commission
pressed heavily on his mind. He constantly averred that having been
endowed with much power, he felt that he had turned that power to evil
rather than to good.
Some historians suggest that he repented having returned to the Church
of Rome. Be this as it may, his opinions respecting the two Churches
were such as to-day would be denominated broad.
His sermons were very remarkable, for eloquence, for talent, and
also for a peculiar sophistry of argument, by which he could twist
every quotation or opinion so as to suit the views he at the moment
entertained.
His manner was earnest and noble, his voice impressive, and few could
listen unmoved to the fervid accents, and to the brilliant and crafty
reasoning by which he advocated the various points of his discourse.
It is evident, by the attachment that was felt for him for upwards of
forty years, by some of the greatest statesmen in Europe, that he had
the talent of conciliating men's minds and commanding their respect;
and in his own diocese he was not only a wise and considerate Bishop,
but he was infinitely loved and admired.
He died in Winchester House, London, but he was buried in Winchester
Cathedral, close by the high altar.
The funeral was solemnised by an amount of pomp and magnificence rare
even in those days, when much outward show was usual in every ceremony.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account