Detective and mystery stories, English; Private investigators -- Fiction
"The _Daily Chronicle_."
"The _what_?"
"The _Daily Chronicle_. Just take a look at the 'agony column' in
yesterday morning's issue, and read the message to 'Yob'--to Gunter, in
fact. That's all."
By this time a cab was waiting in Lombard Street, and two of Plummer's
men, under the doctor's directions, carried Laker to it. No sooner,
however, were they in the court than the two watching women threw
themselves hysterically upon Laker, and it was long before they could be
persuaded that he was not being taken to gaol. The mother shrieked
aloud, "My boy--my boy! Don't take him! Oh, don't take him! They've
killed my boy! Look at his head--oh, his head!" and wrestled desperately
with the men, while Hewitt attempted to soothe her, and promised to
allow her to go in the cab with her son if she would only be quiet. The
younger woman made no noise, but she held one of Laker's limp hands in
both hers.
Hewitt and I dined together that evening, and he gave me a full account
of the occurrences which I have here set down. Still, when he was
finished I was not able to see clearly by what process of reasoning he
had arrived at the conclusions that gave him the key to the mystery, nor
did I understand the "agony column" message, and I said so.
"In the beginning," Hewitt explained, "the thing that struck me as
curious was the fact that Laker was said to have given his own name at
Palmer's in buying his ticket. Now, the first thing the greenest and
newest criminal thinks of is changing his name, so that the giving of
his own name seemed unlikely to begin with. Still, he _might_ have made
such a mistake, as Plummer suggested when he said that criminals usually
make a mistake somewhere--as they do, in fact. Still, it was the least
likely mistake I could think of--especially as he actually didn't wait
to be asked for his name, but blurted it out when it wasn't really
wanted. And it was conjoined with another rather curious mistake, or
what would have been a mistake if the thief were Laker. Why should he
conspicuously display his wallet--such a distinctive article--for the
clerk to see and note? Why rather had he not got rid of it before
showing himself? Suppose it should be somebody personating Laker? In any
case I determined not to be prejudiced by what I had heard of Laker's
betting. A man may bet without being a thief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account