Borgia family; Borja, Francisco de, Saint, 1510-1572; Italy -- History -- 1492-1559
After this, Duke Cesare
publicly declared that he had killed the Prince of Bisceglia, because
the latter had tried to murder him by setting an archer to shoot him
silently in the Vatican gardens:—so far Don Paolo Cappello.
Monsignor Hans Burchard the Caerimonarius says, that, at eleven o’clock
on the night of the fifteenth of July, Prince Don Alonso the husband of
Madonna Lucrezia Borgia was found on the steps of St. Peter’s, wounded
by assassins in the head, the knee, and the right arm. After the
assault, the assassins were escorted by forty knights beyond the
City-gate called Porta Pertusa. Prince Don Alonso lived near the Vatican
in the palace of the Cardinal of Santa Maria _in Portico_; but, owing to
the serious nature of his wounds, he was carried into the pontifical
palace, and lodged in a room of the Borgia Tower. When King Don Federigo
heard of the attempt upon his nephew, he sent Messer Galieno his own
leech to cure him. Later the prince was strangled; and the leeches with
a certain hunchback servant were put to the Question in the Mola of
Hadrian, and afterwards released as innocent.
A chronicle of Pavia of much later date says that Duke Cesare killed
Prince Don Alonso at a time when he was in bed with his own wife Madonna
Lucrezia.
Before examining the divergences of this evidence, it may as well be
said that the original despatches of Don Paolo Cappello the Orator of
Venice are not attainable. Many years later, a learned patrician of
Venice, Don Marino Sanuto, wrote the History of the Venetian Republic
from 1496 to 1533 in fifty-six folio volumes. He cited the
state-archives, despatches of orators, etc., and his work is
marvellously well done: but when all is said, the fact remains that the
despatches of Don Paolo Cappello, with those of many others, have been
edited by a stranger to the writers, and to the circumstances under
which they wrote. Monsignor Burchard held an important office at the
Vatican. He was German, and inimical to Borgia. On matters connected
with his office of Caerimonarius, _i.e._, the superintendence of public
functions, he might speak with some authority: but beyond that he is an
inveterate gossip and scandalmonger. In his case, also, it is impossible
to know what he really wrote, because the original holograph of his
Diarium (with the Diarium of Infessura and other similar works) even now
awaits discovery by students of ancient archives.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account