Borgia family; Borja, Francisco de, Saint, 1510-1572; Italy -- History -- 1492-1559
At the Victoria and Albert Museum of South Kensington, and at the
University Galleries of Oxford, there are very splendid collections of
rings. Neither collection contains a ring having the legendary
needle-point, (or point:) but each collection has a ring which may have
been a proximate occasion of the vulgar belief.
Nº 916 at South Kensington is a massive ring of brass, 1⁷⁄₁₆ inches in
diameter; and has an octagonal bezel externally armed with a quincunx of
spikes. It belongs to the Eighteenth Century, and is of the kind worn by
Bavarian peasant-lads on the right middle finger at the present day.
Nº 385 at Oxford is an Italian ring of the Fourteenth Century, of gold
_niello_, very beautiful. The bezel projects, and ends in the revolving
rowel of a Fiery spur.
Both of these rings are weapons, intended hideously to scratch and tear
an adversary’s face. There is no hollow in them that might harbour
venom; and they are in no sense venomous rings according to the popular
specification: but they are rings,—means of violence of another
species—; and, (men being what they are,) these rings may have formed
the germ of the tradition.
However, at Oxford and South Kensington, there were rings labelled
_Poison Rings_, at the close of the Nineteenth Century.
Nº 479 in the Fortnum Collection at Oxford, is an Italian ring of the
Sixteenth Century, of gold, and having a tiny χερούβ carved in cameo
projecting from the high gold bezel. This bezel is hollow, pierced by
two pinholes. Its capacity is under an eighth of a cubic inch. The
hollow bezel may have been used to contain perfume, introduced through
the pinholes: but it is more reasonable to conjecture that the hollow is
due to a desire to economise the precious metal.
Nº 533 in the same collection, is a German ring of the Seventeenth
Century, of gold, and having a large rough pearl set _in_, not on, its
bezel. Minute examination with microscope and probe proves that there is
absolutely no room in this ring for any venom whatever; and that neither
this, nor the foregoing, deserves the designation “_Poison Ring_,”
which, however, discreetly is queried on the actual official labels.
Apparently, the said labels purely are a concession to the unreasoning
vulgar, who expect as a right to find at least a specimen of venomous
rings in every respectable museum.
At South Kensington there is a massive ring of iron, plated and
damascened with gold. It is Italian, of the Seventeenth Century, ¹¹⁄₁₂
of an inch in diameter. Its octagonal bezel is a tiny box having a
hinged lid. This might have held a relic. There is no ground for
supposing that it ever concealed venom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account