Borgia family; Borja, Francisco de, Saint, 1510-1572; Italy -- History -- 1492-1559
He worked miracles. A lady had two splinters of wood; the one was
unnotable, the other was a Relique of the True Cross: but which was the
Relique was not known. Padre Francisco, to decide, broke them both; from
one, Blood dropped upon a piece of paper. An Infanta of Spain put him to
a similar test: but in this case the relique was said to be a piece of
the skin of St. Bartholomew Apostle (he was flayed alive), with another.
Padre Francisco tore both skins; and again blood dropped from one on
linen. The blood-stained paper and the blood-stained linen, with both
reliques, are in the monastery of Poor Clares at Madrid. Multitudes came
to see the quondam duke as hermit; they said that they saw a radiant
nimbus lighting the pallor of his brow; and to prevent Padre Francisco
from becoming puffed up, (an excessively unnecessary precaution, one
would think,) his superior at Oñate, Padre Ochiva, set him to hard
menial labour, to dig, saw, carry stones, chop wood, light fires, help
in the kitchen, and wheel barrows of manure. The General, to whom every
detail was reported, sent Padre Francisco to preach in Portugal, where
the Company of Jesus was little known; and his mission met with great
results. With himself he was most severe. All physical beauty was gone
from his once gracious body, macerated in ceaseless austerities. He took
the habit of signing his letters _Francisco Pecador_, “Francis the
Sinner”: but his sapient General promptly stopped that practice, saying
that Singularity was not the seed of Sanctity. All letters which came to
him addressed to The Duke of Gandia, he returned, inscribed _Not for
me_, _Francisco S.J._
The Lord Julius P.P. III issued a Brief, offering him a scarlet hat. He
sent a firm refusal in reply. It has been said that he feared to accept
the cardinalate, lest he should be elected Pope at the next Conclave.
The statement is absurd; because
(α) in theory, the election of the Successor of St. Peter is the work
of the Holy Spirit; and _ubi Spiritus ibi libertas_, where the
Spirit is there is liberty: not cardinals alone, but humble
priests as well, or newly tonsured clerks, or any Christian
male, is eligible:—there is no such absurd thing as a
restriction on the Right of the Divinity to choose his Vicar;
and Padre Francisco, therefore, was as liable in black, as he
would have been in scarlet:
(β) if he had been elected Pope, it was open to him to refuse or to
accept the Call.
Some Roman Catholics hold that he _could_ not have refused. But Popes
can abdicate, and have abdicated! But _would_ he have refused? Would he
have been allowed by the General of the Company of Jesus to refuse?
There is no knowing. Such a case has never occurred.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account