Borgia family; Borja, Francisco de, Saint, 1510-1572; Italy -- History -- 1492-1559
Of the two contestants, Cardinal Giuliano della Rovere had the poorer
chance. His own cousins, Cardinals Girolamo and Domenico della Rovere,
would not support him. His personality was universally antipathetic; his
opponent’s was universally sympathetic. The French money which he had
taken, was but as a drop in the ocean compared with the enormous wealth
and desperate determination of the Spaniard. Also, there were no votes
for sale. Four cardinals—the Lords Oliviero Carafa, Giorgio Costa,
Francesco de’ Piccolhuomini, and Giambattista Zeno—announced that they
would vote independently and under no influence; while the remnant of
the Sacred College, consisting of seventeen cardinals, having been
fiercely canvassed by Cardinal Ascanio Maria Sforza-Visconti,
representative of the reigning House of Milan and hereditary foe of
France, were already in the pocket of the Vicechancellor-Cardinal-Dean.
The third night of the Conclave concluded the preliminary discussions;
and at dawn, on the eleventh of August 1492, Cardinal Rodrigo was
elected Pope, by the large majority of twenty-two out of twenty-three,
consisting of his own vote with those of the Cardinal-Bishops Giovanni
Michele, Oliviero Carafa, Giorgio Costa, the Cardinal-Presbyters
Antoniotto Pallavicini, Lorenzo Cibo, Mafeo Gheraldo, Girolamo Basso
della Rovere, Domenico della Rovere, Paolo Fregosio, Giovanni de’ Conti,
Giangiacomo Sclafenati, Ardicino della Porta, the Cardinal-Archdeacon
Francesco de’ Piccolhuomini, the Cardinal-Deacons Rafaele Galeotti
Sansoni-Riarjo, Giovanni Colonna, Giambattista Orsini, Giovanni de’
Medici, Giovanni Savelli, Friderico Sanseverini, Giambattista Zeno, and
Ascanio Maria Sforza-Visconti.
Rome was exciting herself about this election. Four mule loads of silver
had been taken from the palace of Cardinal Rodrigo to the house of
Cardinal Sforza-Visconti before the immuring of the Conclave, most
conceivably to be guarded there more safely. Rome guessed that the
Spaniard was so certain of his own election as to be preparing for the
pleasant custom, which the citizens used, of pillaging the palace of the
cardinal who was elected Pope. Some of the silver perhaps may have
passed into Sforza’s possession; but there is no direct evidence to
prove the absurd statement of Monsignor Burchard that it was the price
of his vote. In the first instance, the security of the silver, was most
probably the motive for its transference. After the election the Pope
would naturally wish to reward his most useful supporter; and no doubt
left the silver[22] with Cardinal Sforza-Visconti while bestowing on him
other and more proportionate acknowledgments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account