Chuang Tzu: Mystic, Moralist, and Social ReformerZhuangzi
Religion
Chuang Tzu: Mystic, Moralist, and Social Reformer
Zhuangzi
Ethics -- China; Philosophy, Chinese
The pure men of old did not know what it was to love life or to
hate death. They did not rejoice in birth, nor strive to put off
dissolution. Quickly come, and quickly go;--no more. They did not
forget whence it was they had sprung, neither did they seek to hasten
their return thither. Cheerfully they played their allotted parts,
waiting patiently for the end. This is what is called not to lead the
heart astray from TAO,
By admitting play of passion in the sense condemned in ch. v. which
would hinder the mind from resting quietly in the knowledge of the
known.
nor to let the human seek to supplement the divine.
But to wait patiently for the knowledge of the unknown.
And this is what is meant by a pure man.
Such men are in mind absolutely free; in demeanour, grave; in
expression, cheerful. If it is freezing cold, it seems to them like
autumn; if blazing hot, like spring. Their passions occur like the four
seasons.
Each at its appointed time.
They are in harmony with all creation, and none know the limit thereof.
These last few words occur in the _Tao-Tê-Ching_, ch. lviii. See _The
Remains of Lao Tzŭ_, p. 40. Also, with a variation, in ch. xxii of
this work.
And so it is that a perfect man can destroy a kingdom and yet not lose
the hearts of the people, while the benefits he hands down to ten
thousand generations do not proceed from love of his fellow-man.
Whatever he does is spontaneous, and therefore natural, and therefore
in accordance with right.
He who delights in man, is himself not a perfect man. His affection is
not true charity.
Charity is the universal love of all creation which admits of no
particular manifestations.
Depending upon opportunity, he has not true worth.
True worth is independent of circumstances. It is a quality which is
always unconsciously operating for good, and needs no opportunity to
call it into existence.
He who is not conversant with both good and evil is not a superior man.
The good, to practise; the evil, to avoid.
He who disregards his reputation is not what a man should be.
As a mere social unit.
He who is not absolutely oblivious of his own existence can never be a
ruler of men.
Thus Hu Pu Hsieh, Wu Kuang, Poh I, Shu Ch'i, Chi Tzŭ Hsü Yü, Chi T'o,
and Shên T'u Ti, were the servants of rulers, and did the behests of
others, not their own.
A list of ancient worthies whose careers had been more or less
unsuccessful. Of the first and second little is known, except that the
ears of the latter were seven inches long.
The third and fourth were brothers and are types of moral purity.
Each refused the throne of their State, because each considered his
brother more entitled thereto. Finally, they died of starvation on the
mountains rather than submit to a change of the Imperial dynasty. More
will be heard of these two later on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account