Church and State as Seen in the Formation of ChristendomAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Religion
Church and State as Seen in the Formation of Christendom
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Church and state; Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Religion and state
"And our Apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be
strife over the dignity of the episcopate. For this cause, therefore,
having received complete foreknowledge, they appointed the aforesaid
persons, and they established a succession, that if these should fall
asleep, other approved men should succeed to their liturgic function.[46]
Those, therefore, that were appointed by them, or afterward by other men
of repute, with the consent of the whole Church, and who performed their
office blamelessly to the flock of Christ, with lowliness, gentleness,
and a generous spirit, and for a long time have borne a good report with
all, these we judge it not consonant with justice to deprive of their
office. For it will be no light sin in us to deprive of the episcopate
those who offer the gifts blamelessly and holily. Blessed are those
presbyters who have gone before, seeing that their departure was fruitful
and ripe, for they have no fear lest any one should remove them from
their appointed place. For we see that you are displacing certain persons
who were living honourably from the office which they had blamelessly
performed."
St. Clement, in the above passages, states in few but precise words how
the whole Christian ministry was appointed by Christ with the most exact
order. "The Master commanded the offerings and liturgic acts to be
performed with care, and not to be done rashly or in disorder, but at
fixed times and seasons. And where and by whom He would have them
performed He himself fixed by His supreme will, that all things being
done with piety, according to His good pleasure, might be acceptable to
His will." We have seen that only the appointment of the supreme
authority—that of St. Peter and the Apostolic College—is recorded in the
Gospels and Acts. All details are omitted. But this does not mean that
such details were either unimportant or left to be developed casually.
Here it is expressly said that our Lord appointed them all, and left
strict injunctions both as to the persons who should execute them and the
things to be done. And then St. Clement assumes rather than states—so
entirely uncontested and acknowledged seems it to be in his mind—that the
Christian order succeeds the Mosaic in the triple division of high
priest, priest, and levite. "They therefore that make their offerings at
the appointed seasons are acceptable and blessed; for while they follow
the institutions of the Master they cannot go wrong." He speaks of a
present, not a past time; of an actual, not a typical order, continuing
thus: "For unto the high priest his proper liturgic acts are assigned,
and to the priests their proper office is appointed, and upon the levites
their proper ministrations are laid. The layman is bound by the layman's
ordinances. Let each of you, brethren, in his own rank, give thanks to
God, maintaining a good conscience, and not transgressing the appointed
rule of His service, but acting with all seemliness."[47] It cannot be
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account