Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Religion
Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
§ 26.1. =Gnosticism= was deeply rooted in a powerful and
characteristic intellectual tendency of the first century. A
persistent conviction that the ancient world had exhausted itself
and was no longer able to resist its threatened overthrow, now
prevailed and drove the deepest thinkers to adopt the boldest and
grandest Syncretism the world has ever beheld, in the blending of
all the previously isolated and heterogeneous elements of culture
as a final attempt at the rejuvenating of that which had become
old (§ 25). Even within the borders of the church this Syncretism
favoured by the prevailing spirit of the age influenced those of
superior culture, to whom the church doctrine of that age did not
seem to make enough of theosophical principles and speculative
thought, while the worship of the church seemed dry and barren.
Out of the fusing of cosmological myths and philosophemes of
oriental and Greek paganism with Christian historical elements in
the crucible of its own speculation, there arose numerous systems
of a higher fantastic sort of religious philosophy, which were
included under the common name of Gnosticism. The pagan element
is upon the whole the prevailing one, inasmuch as in most Gnostic
systems Christianity is not represented as the conclusion and
completion of the development of salvation given in the Old
Testament, but often merely as the continuation and climax of
the pagan religion of nature and the pagan mystery worship.
The attitude of this heretical gnosis toward holy scripture was
various. By means of allegorical interpretation some endeavoured
to prove their system from it; others preferred to depreciate the
Apostles as falsifiers of the original purely gnostic doctrine
of Christ, or to remodel the apostolic writings in accordance
with their own views, or even to produce a bible of their own
after the principles of their own schools in the form of gnostic
pseudepigraphs. With them, however, for the most part the
tradition of ancient wisdom as the communicated secret doctrine
stood higher than holy scripture. Over against the heretical
gnosis, an ecclesiastical gnosis was developed, especially in the
Alexandrian school of theology (Clement and Origen, § 31, 4, 5),
which, according to 1 Cor. xii. 8, 9; xiii. 2, was esteemed
and striven after as, in contradistinction to faith, a higher
stage in the development of the religious consciousness. The
essential distinction between the two consisted in this, that
the latter was determined, inspired and governed by the believing
consciousness of the universal church, as gradually formulated in
the church confession, whereas the former, completely emancipated
therefrom, disported itself in the unrestricted arbitrariness of
fantastic speculation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account