Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Religion
Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
Manichæism makes its appearance in Persia about the middle of the
third century, independently of the Gentile-Christian Gnosticism of the
Roman empire, which was more or less under the influence of the Greek
philosophy of the second century, but bearing undoubted connection with
Mandæism (§ 25, 1), and Elkesaism (§ 28, 2). In principle and tendency,
it was at various points, as _e.g._ in its theory of emanation, its
doceticism, etc., connected with Gnosticism, but was distinguished
therefrom pre-eminently by using Christian soteriological ideas
and modes of thought as a mere varnish for oriental pagan or
Babylonian-Chaldaic theosophy, putting this in place of Platonic or
Stoical notions which are quite foreign to it, basing the system on
Persian dualism and impregnating it with elements from Buddhist ethics.
Another point in which it is distinguished from Gnosticism is that it
does not present itself as an esoteric form of religion meant only for
the few specially gifted spirits, but distinctly endeavours to build up
a community of its own with a regularly articulated constitution and a
well organized ritual.
§ 29.1. =The Founder.=--What the Greek and Latin Fathers (Titus
of Bostra, Epiphanius, Augustine, etc.) say about the person and
history of the founder of this sect is derived mainly from an
account of a disputation which a bishop Archelaus of Cascar in
Mesopotamia is said to have held with Manes or Manichæus. This
document is written in Syriac and dates about A.D. 320, but it
is simply a polemical work under the guise of a debate between
men with historical names. These “Acts” have come down to us in
a very corrupt Latin version, and contain, especially in their
historical allusions, much that is incredible and legendary,
while in their representation of the doctrine of Manes they are
much more deserving of confidence. According to them the origin
of Manichæism is to be attributed to a far travelled Saracen
craftsman, named Scythianus, who lived in the age of the Apostles.
His disciple, Terebinthus, who subsequently in Babylon took
the name Buddas, and affirmed that he had been born of a
virgin, wrote at the master’s dictation four books, _Mysteria_,
_Capitula_, _Evangelium_, _Thesaurus_, which after his death
came into the possession of a freed slave, Cubricus or Corbicus.
This man made the wisdom taught therein his own, developed it
more fully, appeared in Persia as the founder of a new religion,
and called himself Manes. He was even received at court, but
his failure to heal a prince was used by the jealous magicians
to secure his overthrow. He escaped, however, from prison,
and found a safe hiding place in Arabion, an old castle in
Mesopotamia. Meanwhile he had got access to the sacred writings
of the Christians and borrowed much from them for the further
development of his system. He now gave himself out as the
Paraclete promised by Christ, and by means of letters and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account