Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Religion
Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
§ 30. THE THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE OF THE POST-APOSTOLIC
AGE, A.D. 70-170.[53]
The literary remains of the so-called Apostolic Fathers constitute the
first fruits of Patristic-Christian literature. These are in respect of
number and scope insignificant, and, inasmuch as they had their origin,
from the special individual circumstances of their writers, they were
composed for the most part in the form of epistles. The old traditional
view that the authors of these treatises had enjoyed the immediate
fellowship and instruction of the Apostles is at once too narrow
and too wide. Among these writings must be included first of all the
recently discovered “Teaching of the Twelve Apostles.” About A.D. 130,
when Christianity was making its way among the ranks of the cultured,
Christian writers began to feel themselves called upon to engage with
paganism in a literary warfare defensive and offensive, in order to
repel the charges and calumnies raised against their religion and to
demonstrate its inner worth in opposition to the moral and religious
degradation of heathenism. These writings had a more theological and
scientific character than those of the Apostolic Fathers, which had more
of a practical and hortatory tendency. The works of these Apologists
still extant afford interesting and significant glimpses of the life,
doctrine, and thinking of the Christians of that age, which but for
these writings would have been almost unknown.
§ 30.1. =The Beginnings of Patristic Literature.=--According to
the established rule of the church we have to distinguish between
New Testament and Patristic literature in this way: to the former
belongs those writings to which, as composed by Apostles or at
least under Apostolic authority, the ancient church assigned
an objectively fundamental and regulative significance for
further ecclesiastical development; while in the latter we have
represented the subjective conception and estimation which the
Church Fathers made of the Christian message of salvation and
the structure they reared upon this foundation. The so-called
Apostolic Fathers may be regarded as occupying a position
midway between the two and forming a transition from the one
to the other, or as themselves constituting the first fruits
of Patristic literature. Indeed as regards the New Testament
writings themselves the ancient church was long uncertain and
undecided as to the selection of them from the multitude of
contemporary writings;[54] and Eusebius still designated several
of the books that were subsequently definitely recognised
ἀντιλεγόμενα; while modern criticism has not only repeated such
doubts as to the genuineness of these writings but has extended
these doubts to other books of the New Testament. But even this
criticism cannot deny the historical significance assigned above
to those New Testament books contested by it, even though it may
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account