Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Religion
Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
a. =Clement of Rome= was one of the first Roman bishops,
probably the third (§ 16, 1). The opinion that he is to
be identified with the Clement named in Phil. iv. 3 is
absolutely unsupported. The sameness of age and residence
in some small measure favours the identifying him with
Tit. Flav. Clemens [Clement], the consul, and cousin of the
Emperor, who on account of his Christianity (?) was executed
in A.D. 95 (§ 22, 1). Besides a multitude of other writings
which subsequently assumed his well-known name (§ 28, 3;
43, 4), there are ascribed to him two so-called Epistles
to the Corinthians, of which however, the second certainly
is not his. The First Epistle which in the ancient church
was considered worthy to be used in public worship, was
afterwards lost, but fragments of it were recovered in
A.D. 1628 in the so-called _Codex Alexandrinus_ (§ 152, 2),
together with a portion of the so-called “Second Epistle.”
Recently however both writings were found in a complete
form by Bryennius, Metropolitan of Serrä in Macedonia, in
a Jerusalem Codex of A.D. 1056 discovered at Constantinople
and published by him.[56] In the following year a Codex
of the Syrian New Testament at Cambridge was more closely
examined,[57] and in it there was found a complete Syriac
translation of both writings inserted between the Catholic
and the Pauline Epistles, while in _Codex Alexandrinus_ they
are placed after the Apocalypse. =The “First” Epistle=, the
date of which is generally given as A.D. 93-95, does not
give the author’s name, but is assigned to Clement of Rome
by Dionysius of Corinth in A.D. 170, as quoted in Eusebius,
and by Irenæus, Clement of Alexandria, and Origen, and
described as written from Rome in name of the church of that
place to the church of Corinth, counselling peace and unity.
In the passage c. 58-63, formerly wanting but now restored,
the exhortation passes into a long prayer with intercessions
for those in authority and for the church according to what
was perhaps already the customary form of public prayer in
Rome. Both churches, those of Rome and Corinth, are admitted
without dispute to have been Gentile Christian churches,
which had accepted the Pauline type of doctrine, without
however fully fathoming or understanding it. But Peter also
occupies a position of equal honour alongside of Paul, and
nowhere does any trace appear of a consciousness of any
opposition between the two apostles. The divine sonship
of the Redeemer and His consequent universal sovereignty
are the basis of the Christian confession, but no sort
of developed doctrine of the divinity of Christ is here
found, and even His pre-existence is affirmed only as the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account