Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Religion
Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
§ 33.4. =Praxeas and Tertullian.=--Patripassianism, which
represented the Father Himself as becoming man and suffering in
Christ, may be characterized as the precursor and first crude
form of Modalism. It also had its origin during the 2nd cent.,
in that same intellectually active church of Asia Minor, and
from thence the movement spread to Rome, where after a long and
bitter struggle it secured a footing in the 3rd cent.--=Praxeas=,
a confessor of Asia Minor and opponent of Montanism, was its first
representative at Rome, where unopposed he expounded his views
about A.D. 190. As he supported the Roman bishop Victor in his
condemnation of Montanism (§ 40, 2), so he seems to have won
the bishop’s approval for his Christological theory.[92] Perhaps
also the excommunication which was at this time uttered against
the dynamic Monarchian, Theodotus the Elder, was the result of
the bishop’s change of views. From Rome Praxeas betook himself,
mainly in the interest of his Anti-Montanist crusade, to Carthage,
and there also won adherents to his Christology. Meanwhile,
however, Tertullian returned to Carthage, and as a convert
to Montanism, hurled against Praxeas and his followers a
controversial treatise, in which he laid bare with acute
dialectic the weaknesses and inconsistencies, as well as the
dangerous consequences of their theory. Just like the Alogians,
Praxeas and his adherents refused to admit the doctrine of the
Logos into their Christology, and feared that it in connection
with the doctrine of the hypostasis would give an advantage to
Gnosticism. In the interests of monotheism, as well as of the
worship of Christ, they maintained the perfect identity of Father
and Son. God became the Son by the assumption of the flesh;
under the concept of the Father therefore falls the divinity,
the spirit; under that of the Son, the humanity, the flesh of
the Redeemer.--=Tertullian= himself in his Hypostasianism had not
wholly got beyond the idea of subordinationism, but he made an
important advance in this direction by assuming three stages in
the hypostasizing of the Son (_Filiatio_). The first stage is
the eternal immanent state of being of the Son in the Father; the
second is the forthcoming of the Son alongside of the Father for
the purpose of creating the world; and the third is the going
forth of the Son into the world by means of the incarnation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account