Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Religion
Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
namely, that of instruction, for which on an average a period
of two years was required, and that of immediate preparation by
prayer and fasting after the instructions had been completed.
During the former period the aspirants were called κατηχοῦμενοι,
_Catechumeni_; during the latter, φωτιζόμενοι, _Competentes_.
As to their participation in the public divine service, the
Catechumens were first of all as ἀκροώμενοι admitted only to the
hearing of the sermon, and had thus no essential privileges over
the unbelievers. They first came into closer connection with
the church only when it was permitted them to take part in
the devotional exercises, yet only in those portions which had
reference to themselves, kneeling as γονυκλίνοντες, while also
the congregation prayed kneeling. Only in cases of dangerous
illness could baptism be given before the Catechumen had
completed his full course (_Baptismus Clinicorum_). The Council
of Neo-Cæsarea soon after A.D. 314 ordained that a Catechumen
who as a γονυκλίνων had been guilty of an open sin, should be
put back to the first stage of the Catechumenate, namely, to that
of the ἀκροᾶσθαι, and if he then again sinned he should be cast
off altogether; and the Œcumenical Council of Nicæa in A.D. 325
demanded that offending (παραπέσοντες) Catechumens should remain
ἀκροώμενοι for three years and only then should be allowed to
take part in the devotional service of the church.[98]
§ 35.2. =The Baptismal Formula.=--In close connection with the
words of institution of baptism (Matt. xxviii. 19) and hence in
a trinitarian framework, an outline of the doctrine common to all
the churches, introduced first of all as a confession of faith
professed by candidates for baptism, obtained currency at a very
early date. Only a few unimportant modifications were afterwards
made upon it, and amid all the varieties of provincial and local
conditions, the formula remained essentially the same. Hence it
could always be properly characterized with Irenæus as ἀκλινής,
and with Tertullian as _immobilis et irreformabilis_. As a token
of membership in the Catholic church it is called the Baptismal
Formula or =Symbolum=. After the introduction of the _Disciplina
arcani_ (§ 36, 4) it was included in that, and hence was kept
secret from heathens and even from catechumens, and first
communicated to the _competentes_. As the “unalterable and
inflexible” test and standard of the faith and doctrine, as
well as an intellectual bond of union between churches scattered
over all the earth, it was called =Regula fidei= and Κανὼν τῆς
ἀληθείας. That we never find it quoted in the Old Catholic Age,
is to be explained from its inclusion in the _disciplina arcani_
and by this also, that the ancient church in common with Jeremiah
(xxxi. 33), laid great stress upon its being engraven not with
pen and ink on paper, but with the pen of the Holy Spirit on the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account