Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Religion
Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
had =Latin Translations= of the biblical books, the origin of
which is to be sought in North Africa, where in consequence
of prevailing ignorance of the Greek language the need of
such translations was most deeply felt. Even so early as the
beginning of the 5th century we find Jerome († 420) complaining
of _varietas_ and _vitiositas_ of the _Codices latini_, and
declaring: _Tot sunt exemplaria_ (=forms of the text) _paene
quot codices_. Augustine[101] gives preference to the _Itala_
over all others. The name =Itala= is now loosely given to all
fragments of Latin translations previous to that of Jerome.--The
Syriac translation, =the Peshito=, plain or simple (so-called
because it exactly and without paraphrasing renders the words
of the Hebrew and Greek originals) belongs to the 3rd century,
although first expressly referred to by Ephraim. In it 2 Peter,
2 and 3 John and Jude are not found.
§ 36.9. =The Doctrine of Inspiration.=--In earlier times it
was usual, after the example of Philo, to regard the prophetic
inspiration of the sacred writers as purely passive, as ἔκστασις.
Athenagoras compares the soul of the prophet while prophesying
to a flute; Justin Martyr in his _Cohort. ad Græc._ to a lyre,
struck by the Holy Spirit as the _plectrum_, etc. The Montanist
prophets first brought this theory into disrepute. The Apologist
Miltiades of Asia Minor was the first Church Teacher who
vindicated over against the Montanists the proposition: προφήτην
μὴ δεῖν ἐν ἐκστάσει λαλεῖν. The Alexandrians who even admitted
an operation of the Holy Spirit upon the nobler intellects of
paganism, greatly modified the previously accepted doctrine
of inspiration. Origen, for example, teaches a gradual rising
or falling in the measure of inspiration even in the bible,
and determines this according to the more or less prominence
secured by the human individuality of the writers of scripture.
§ 36.10. =Hymnology.=--The _Carmen Christo quasi Deo dicere
secum invicem_ in the report of Pliny (§ 22, 2), may be classed
with the antiphonal responsive hymns of the church. Tertullian
bears witness to a rich use of song in family as well as
congregational worship. So too does Origen. In the composition
of church hymns the heretics seem for a long while to have kept
abreast of the Catholics (Bardesanes and Harmonius, § 27, 5),
but the latter were thereby stirred up to greater exertions.
The Martyr Athenogenes and the Egyptian bishop Nepos are named
as authors of church hymns. We have still a hymn εἰς Σωτῆρα by
Clement of Alexandria. Socrates ascribes to Ignatius, bishop
of Antioch, the introduction of the alternate-song (between
different congregational choirs). More credible is Theodoret’s
statement that the Antiochean monks Flavian and Diodorus had
imported it, about A.D. 260, from the National Syrian into the
Greek-Syrian church.--Continuation § 59, 4, 5.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account