Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Religion
Church History, Volume 1 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
§ 43.1. The =Jus circa sacra= gave to the =Emperors= the right of
legally determining all the relations between church and state,
but assigned to them also the duty of caring for the preservation
or restoration of peace and of unity in the church, guarding
orthodoxy with a strong arm, looking after the interests of
the church and the clergy, and maintaining the authority of
ecclesiastical law. Even Constantine the Great excluded all
heretics from the privileges which he accorded to the church,
and regarded it as a duty forcibly to prevent their spread.
The destruction or closing of their churches, prohibition of
public meetings, banishment of their leaders, afterwards seizure
of their possessions, were the punishments which the state
invariably used for their destruction. The first death sentence
on a heretic was issued and executed so early as A.D. 385 by
the usurper Maximus (§ 54, 2), but this example was not imitated
during this period. Constans II. in A.D. 654 gave the first
example of scourging to the effusion of blood and barbarous
mutilation upon a persistent opponent of his union system of
doctrine (§ 52, 8). The fathers of the 4th century were decidedly
opposed to all compulsion in matters of faith (comp. however
§ 63, 1). The right of determining by imperial edict what was
to be believed and taught in the empire was first asserted by
the usurper Basilicus in A.D. 476 (§ 52, 5). The later emperors
followed this example; most decidedly Justinian I. (§ 52, 6)
and the court theologians justified such assumptions from
the emperor’s sacerdotal rank, which was the antitype of that
of Melchizedec [Melchisedec]. The emperor exercised a direct
influence upon the choice of bishops especially in the capital
cities; at a later period the emperor quite arbitrarily appointed
these and set them aside. The church’s power to afford protection
secured for it generally a multitude of outward privileges and
advantages. The state undertook the support of the church partly
by rich gifts and endowments from state funds, partly by the
making over of temples and their revenues to the church, and
Constantine conferred upon the church the right of receiving
bequests of all kinds. The churches and their officers were
expressly exempted from all public burdens. The distinct
judicial authority of the bishops recognised of old was
formally legitimized by Constantine under the name of _Audentia
episcopalis_. The clergy themselves were exempted from the
jurisdiction of civil tribunals and were made subject to an
ecclesiastical court. The right of asylum was taken from the
heathen temples and conferred upon the Christian churches. With
this was connected also the right of episcopal intercession or
of interference with regard to decisions already come to by the
civil courts which were thus in some measure subject to clerical
control.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account