Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
History
Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
his “_Nathan_” only Judaism and Mohammedanism are represented by
truly noble and ideal characters, while the chief representative
of Christianity is a gloomy zealot, and the conclusion of the
parable is that all three rings are counterfeit. In another
work he views revelation as one of the stages in “The Education
of the Human Race,” which loses its significance as soon as
its purpose is served. In familiar conversation with Jacobi
he frankly declared his acceptance of the doctrine of Spinoza:
Ἓν καὶ πᾶν.[522] =Wieland=, A.D. 1733-1813, soon turned
from his youthful zeal for ecclesiastical orthodoxy to the
popular philosophy of the cultured man of the world. =Herder=,
A.D. 1744-1803, with his enthusiastic appreciation of the
poetical contents of the Bible, especially of the Old Testament,
was not slow to point out the insipidity of its ordinary
treatment. =Goethe=, A.D. 1749-1832, profoundly hated the
vandalism of neology, delighted in “The Confessions of a
Fair Soul” (§ 172, 2), had in earlier years sympathy with the
Herrnhuters, but in the full intellectual vigour of his manhood
thought he had no need of Christianity, which offended him by
its demand for renunciation of self and the world. =Schiller=,
A.D. 1759-1805, enthusiastically admiring everything noble,
beautiful and good, misunderstood Christianity, and introduced
into the hearts of the German people Kantian rationalism clothed
in rich poetic garb. His lament on the downfall of the gods of
Greece, even if not so intended by the poet himself, told not so
much against orthodox Christianity as against poverty-stricken
deism, which banished the God of Christianity from the world
and set in his place the dead forces of nature. And if indeed
he really thought that for religion’s sake he should confess
to no religion, he has certainly in many profoundly Christian
utterances given unconscious testimony to Christianity.--The
Jacobi philosophy of feeling found poetic interpreters in =Jean
Paul Richter=, A.D. 1763-1825, and =Hebel=, died A.D. 1826, in
whom we find the same combination of pious sentiment which is
drawn toward Christianity and the sceptical understanding which
allied itself to the revolt against the common orthodoxy. =J. H.
Voss=, a rough, powerful Dutch peasant, who in his “_Luise_”
sketched the ideal of a brave rationalistic country parson, and,
with the inexorable rigour of an inquisitor, hunted down the
night birds of ignorance and oppression. But alongside of those
children of the world stood two genuine sons of Luther, =Matthias
Claudius=, A.D. 1740-1815, and =J. G. Hamann=, A.D. 1730-1788,
the “Magus of the North” and the Elijah of his age, of whom Jean
Paul said that his commas were planetary systems and his periods
solar systems, to whom the philosopher Hemsterhuis erected in
the garden of Princess Gallitzin a tablet with the inscription:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account