Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
History
Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
§ 182.2. =The Older Rationalistic Theology.=--The older,
so-called vulgar rationalism, was characterized by the
self-sufficiency with which it rejected all advances from
philosophy and theology, science and national literature. The
new school of historico-critical rationalism availed itself
of every aid in the direction of scientific investigation. The
father of the vulgar rationalism of this age was =Röhr= of Weimar,
who exercised his ingenuity in proving how one holding such
views might still hold office in the church. To this school also
belonged =Paulus= of Heidelberg, described by Marheineke as one
who believes he thinks and thinks he believes but was incapable
of either; =Wegscheider= of Halle, who in his “_Institutions
theol. Christ. dogmaticæ_” repudiates miracles; =Bretschneider=
of Gotha, who began as a supernaturalist and afterwards went over
to extreme rationalism; and =Ammon= of Dresden, who afterwards
passed over to rational supernaturalism.
§ 182.3. The founder of =Historico-critical Rationalism= was
=De Wette=; a contemporary of Schleiermacher in Berlin University,
but deprived of office in A.D. 1819 for sending a letter of
condolence to the mother of Sands, which was regarded as an
apology for his crime. From A.D. 1822 till his death in A.D. 1849
he continued to work unweariedly in Basel. His theological
position had its starting point in the philosophy of his friend
Fries, which he faithfully adhered to down to the end of his life.
His friendship with Schleiermacher had also a powerful influence
upon him. He too placed religion essentially in feeling,
which, however, he associated much more closely with knowledge
and will. In the church doctrines he recognised an important
symbolical expression of religious truths, and so by the out and
out rationalist he was all along sneered at as a mystic. But his
chief strength lay in the sharp critical treatment which he gave
to the biblical canon and the history of the O.T. and N.T. His
commentaries on the whole of the N.T. are of permanent value, and
contain his latest thoughts, when he had approached most nearly
to positive Christianity. His literary career began in A.D. 1806
with a critical examination of the books of Chronicles. He also
wrote on the Psalms, on Jewish history, on Jewish archæology,
and made a new translation of the Bible. His Introductions to
the O.T. and N.T. have been translated into English.--=Winer=
of Leipzig is best known by his “Grammar of New Testament Greek,”
first published in A.D. 1822, of which several English and
American translations have appeared, the latest and best that of
Dr. Moulton, made in A.D. 1870, from the sixth German edition. He
also edited an admirable “_Bibl. Reallexicon_,” and wrote a work
on symbolics which has been translated into English under the
title “A Comparative View of the Doctrines and Confessions of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account