Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
History
Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
§ 182.6. =Speculative Theology.=--Its founder was =Daub=,
professor at Heidelberg from A.D. 1794 till his death in
A.D. 1836. Occupying and writing from the philosophical
standpoints of Kant, Fichte, and Schelling successively, he
published in A.D. 1816 “Judas Iscariot,” an elaborate discussion
of the nature of evil, but passed over in A.D. 1833, with his
treatise on dogmatics, to the Hegelian position. He exerted
great influence as a professor, but his writings proved to most
unintelligible.--=Marheineke= of Berlin in the first edition
of his “Dogmatics” occupied the standpoint of Schelling, but in
the second set forth Lutheran orthodoxy in accordance with the
formulæ of the Hegelian system.--After Hegel’s death in A.D. 1831
his older pupils =Rosenkranz= and =Göschel= sought to enlist his
philosophy in the service of orthodoxy. =Richter= was the first
to give offence, by his “Doctrine of the Last Things,” in which
he denounced the doctrine of immortality in the sense of personal
existence after death. =Strauss=, A.D. 1808-1874, represented
the “Life of Jesus,” in his work of A.D. 1835, as the product
of unintentional romancing, and in his “_Glaubenslehre_” of
A.D. 1840, sought to prove that all Christian doctrines are
put an end to by modern science, and openly taught pantheism
as the residuum of Christianity. =Bruno Bauer=, after passing
from the right to the left Hegelian wing, described the gospels
as the product of conscious fraud, and =Ludwig Feuerbach=,
in his “Essence of Christianity,” A.D. 1841, set forth in all
its nakedness the new gospel of self-adoration. The breach
between the two parties in the school was now complete. Whatever
Rosenkranz and Schaller from the centre, and Göschel and Gabler
from the right, did to vindicate the honour of the system,
they could not possibly restore the for ever shattered illusion
that it was fundamentally Christian. Those of the right fell
back into the camps of “the German theology” and the Lutheran
confessionalism; while in the latest times the left has no
prominent theological representative but Biedermann of Zürich.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account