Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
History
Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
Protestantism, as contrary to truth, the furious fathers of the
majority amid shouts and roars, shaking of their fists, rushed
upon the platform, and the president was obliged to adjourn the
sitting. At the next session the objectionable statement was
withdrawn and the entire _schema_ of the faith was unanimously
adopted at the third public sitting of the council on April 24th.
=The Schema of the Church= came up for a consideration on
May 10th. The discussion turned first and mainly on the fourth
article about the infallibility of the pope. Its biblical
foundation was sought in Luke xxii. 32, its traditional basis
chiefly in the well-known passage of Irenæus (§ 34, 8) and on
its supposed endorsement by the general councils of Lyons and
Florence (§ 67, 4, 6), but the main stress was laid on its
necessarily following from the position of the pope as the
representative of Christ. The opposition party had from the
outset their position weakened by the conduct of many of their
adherents who, partly to avoid giving excessive annoyance to the
pope, and partly to leave a door open for their retreat, did not
contest the correctness of the doctrine in question, but all the
more decidedly urged the inopportuneness of its formal definition
as threatening the church with a schism and provocative of
dangerous conflicts with the civil power. The longer the decision
was deferred by passionate debates, the more determinedly did
the pope throw the whole weight of his influence into the scales.
By bewitching kindliness he won some, by sharp, angry words he
terrified others. He denounced opponents as sectarian enemies of
the church and the apostolic chair, and styled them ignoramuses,
slaves of princes, and cowards. He trusted the aid of the blessed
Virgin to ward off threatened division. To the question whether
he himself regarded the formulating of the dogma as opportune,
he answered: “No, but as necessary.” Urged by the Jesuits, he
confidently declared that it was notorious that the whole church
at all times taught the absolute infallibility of the pope;
and on another occasion he silenced a modest doubt as to a
sure tradition with the dictatorial words, _La tradizione
sono io_, adding the assurance, “As Abbáte Mastai I believe in
infallibility, as pope I have experienced it.” On July 13th the
final vote was called for in the general congregation. There were
371 who voted simply _placet_, sixty-one _placet juxta modum_,
_i.e._ with certain modifications, and eighty-eight _non placet_.
After a last hopeless attempt by a deputation to obtain the
pope’s consent to a milder formulating of the decree, Bishop
Ketteler vainly entreating on his knees, to save the unity and
peace of the church by some small concession, the fifty hitherto
steadfast members of the minority returned home, after emitting
a written declaration that they after as well as before must
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account