Church History (Volumes 1-3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
History
Church History (Volumes 1-3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
the people of God, the children of the faith of Abraham.
From the Old Testament he proves the divinity of the person
and doctrine of Christ, and from the Ἀπομνημονεύματα τῶν
ἀποστόλων (§ 36, 7) he derives his information about the
historical life, teaching, and works of Jesus. The Gospel
of John, although never mentioned, was not unknown to him,
but it appeared to him more as a doctrinal and hortatory
treatise than as a historical document, and undoubtedly
his Logos doctrine is connected with that of John. He shows
himself familiar with the Epistles of Paul, although he
never expressly quotes from them.
§ 30.10.
b. =Tatian=, a Greek born in Assyria (according to Zahn, a
Semite) while engaged as a rhetorician at Rome, was won to
Christianity by Justin Martyr, according to Harnack about
A.D. 150. As the fruit of youthful zeal, he published an
Apologetical Λόγος πρὸς Ἕλληνας, in which he treats the
Greek paganism and its culture with withering scorn for
even its noblest manifestations, and shared with his teacher
the hatred and persecution of the philosopher Crescens.
His later written Εὐαγγέλιον διὰ τεσσάρων (§ 36, 7) was a
Gospel harmony, in which the removal of all reference to
the descent of Jesus from the seed of David, according
to the flesh, objected to by Theodoret, was occasioned
perhaps more by antipathy to Ebionism than by any sympathy
with Gnosticism. Zahn affirms, while Harnack decidedly
denies, that this work was originally composed in Syriac. The
exclusive use by the Syrians of the Greek name _Diatessaron_
seems to afford a strong argument for a Greek original.
Its general agreement with the readings of the so-called
Itala (§ 36, 8) witnesses to the West as the place of its
composition. The introduction of a Syriac translation of it
into church use in the East is to be explained by a longer
residence of the author in his eastern home; and its neglect
on the part of many of the Greek and Latin Church Fathers,
and even their complete ignorance of it, may be accounted
for by the fact that, while in the far East it was
unsuspected, elsewhere it came to be branded as heretical
(§ 27, 10).[69]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account