As we shall later find herein, it is the claim of all who believe the new Amendment to be in our Constitution, although they have hitherto not understood their own claim, that the words of the Article, which appear in that short record, are the words which changed the American individuals, free men from July 4, 1776, into subjects of an omnipotent government, composed of the legislative governments of a fractional part of the states. Moreover, as we shall also later learn herein, this absurd and amazing claim is based wholly on the monumental error of assuming, without the faintest suggestion or proffer of support for such an assumption, that the new wording of the Fifth Article, as proposed by Madison on September 10, changed the amending Article into a grant of ability to make every kind of Article. The monumental error fails to see that Madison merely added to the previous mention of the unlimited ability of the people or “conventions” a similar mention of the existing limited ability of the state legislative governments to make _federal_ Articles or Articles which neither exercise nor grant power to interfere with human freedom. Moreover, as we shall also learn later herein, the extraordinary and unfounded assumption (that the amending Article was changed on September 10 into a _grant_ of ability to make Articles instead of a recognition and mention of two existing different abilities, one of which had always been mentioned therein) has been hitherto concurred in by every one who has challenged the validity of the Eighteenth Amendment. _They_ have only differed from the supporters of the new Amendment in contending that the impossible grant, absurdly imagined to have been made by the grantors to _themselves_ as well as to state legislatures, _was_ a _grant_ of limited ability but did not include the ability to make an amendment such as the Eighteenth.