Civilization and ethics : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 2Schweitzer, Albert
Philosophy
Civilization and ethics : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 2
Schweitzer, Albert
Civilization -- History; Ethics
All the earlier methods followed to establish utilitarianism continue
at work in the nineteenth century. Friedrich Eduard Beneke
(1798-1854),_(_50_)_ the translator of Bentham, [pg 152] and Ludwig
Andreas Feuerbach (1804-1872)_(_51_)_ take up with confidence the
attempts of David Hartley and Dietrich von Holbach to derive the
unegoistic directly from the egoistic, and try hard to complete them
in a deepened psychology. Beneke believes himself able to show how
through the continuous influence of reason on the feelings of pleasure
and non-pleasure, there builds itself up in man a capacity for moral
judgement which holds up before him as the highest goal for his
activity the all-round perfecting of human society. Feuerbach derives
altruism from the possession by man of an impulse to think himself
into the personality of others and to put himself in their place.
Thereby, he says, his impulse to seek happiness loses its original
independence, and suffers if the happiness of others is spoilt. At
last, under the influence of habit, man forgets altogether that his
relation of helpfulness with his fellows was originally meant to
satisfy the impulse to seek his own happiness, and he conceives his
own care for their welfare as duty.
Ernest Laas (1837-1885),_(_52_)_ repeats the view that ethics consist
primarily in the individual’s acceptance of the rules laid down by
society, an acceptance which from being a matter of habit becomes at
last unconscious and automatic.
In general, however, the utilitarianism of the nineteenth century
props itself up with the assumption which is first made by David Hume
and Adam Smith, that from the very beginning the non-egoistic is given
in human nature side by side with the egoistic.
Auguste Comte (1798-1857)_(_53_)_ in his _Physiology of Society_
praises as the greatest achievement of his time the then commencing
recognition of the fundamental social tendency in human nature. The
future of mankind depends in his opinion on intelligence working
correctly and perseveringly [pg 153] on this endowment, and so
rendering man’s natural benevolence capable of achieving the noblest
and most beneficial objects. If devotion to the universal good remains
at work in the multitude of individuals so as to provide the necessary
complement to their natural egoism, there will arise out of the
rational understanding between the two a society which is ever
bringing itself nearer to perfection in its economic and social
relations.
A great defender and developer of utilitarianism in England was John
Stuart Mill (1806-1873),_(_54_)_ who in this followed in the footsteps
of his father, James Mill (1773-1836).
Darwin and Spencer
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account