Civilization in the United States: An inquiry by thirty Americans
General
Civilization in the United States: An inquiry by thirty Americans
United States -- Civilization
“Now that the war is passed, the spirit of propaganda still
remains in the reluctance with which is returned to an
impatient people the ancient right of access to knowledge
of the truth, the right of free assembly, and the right of
freedom of speech. Meanwhile the hesitancy with which these
are returned breeds in large groups vague suspicion and
acrimonious distrust of that which is published as truth, and
which actually is true, so that on all sides we hear the query
whether we are being indulged with what is considered good for
us, or with that which constitutes the facts. Thus we impair
the validity of truth and open the door and give opportunity
for authority which is not justly theirs to be ascribed to
falsehood and deceit.”
The war was a test which showed how feeble was the hold of American
education upon the principle which alone can give it validity. Nowhere
was the suppression of freedom of mind, of truth, so energetic, so
vindictive as in the schools. Instances crowd upon the mind. I remember
attending the trial of a teacher before a committee of the New York
School Board, the point being whether his reasons for not entering
with his class upon a discussion of the Soviet government concealed
a latent sympathy with that form of social organization. The pupils
were ranged in two groups, Jews and Gentiles, and were summoned in
turn to give their testimony--they had previously been educated in
the important functions of modern American society, espionage, and
mass action. Another occasion is commemorated by the New York _Evening
Post_, the teacher being on trial for disloyalty and the chief count in
his indictment that he desired an early peace; and his accuser, one Dr.
John Tildsley, an Archdeacon or superintendent of the diocese of New
York under Bishop Ettinger:
“Are you interested in having this man discharged?”
“I am,” said Dr. Tildsley.
“Do you know of any act that would condemn him as a teacher?”
“Yes,” said Dr. Tildsley, “he favoured an early peace.”
“Don’t you want an early, victorious peace?”
“Why ask me a question like that?”
“Because I want to show you how unfair you have been to this
teacher.”
“But Mr. Mufson wanted an early peace without victory,” said
Dr. Tildsley.
“He didn’t say that, did he? He did not say an early peace
without victory?”
“No.”
“Then you don’t want an early peace, do you?”
“No.”
“You want a prolongation of all this world misery?”
“To a certain extent, yes,” said Dr. Tildsley.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account