Class Book for the School of Musketry, Hythe: Prepared for the Use of OfficersWilford, Ernest Christian
History
Class Book for the School of Musketry, Hythe: Prepared for the Use of Officers
Wilford, Ernest Christian
Firearms; Gunpowder; Military education; Shooting, Military
Joshua Barnes, in his life of Edward III., observes, that “without all
question, the guns which are used now-a-days, are neither so terrible in
battle nor do such execution nor work such confusion as arrows can do;
for bullets, being not seen, only hurt where they hit, but arrows
enrage the horse, and break the array, and terrify all that behold them
in the bodies of their neighbours. Not to say that every archer can
shoot thrice to a gunner’s once, and that whole squadrons of bows may
let fly at one time, when only one or two files of musqueteers can
discharge at once. Also, that whereas guns are useless when your pikes
join, because they only do execution point-blank, the arrows which will
kill at random may do good service even behind your men of arms.”
~Long-bow the favourite in Henry VIII.~
Although fire-arms had attained no inconsiderable degree of perfection
in the reign of Henry VIII., yet the long-bow was still the favourite
weapon.
~Merits balanced in Queen Mary’s reign.~
So indifferent were the ministers of Queen Mary respecting them, that in
her ordinance respecting armour and weapons, the alternative is left to
the choice of the people, whether they should find a long-bow and sheaf
of arrows, or a haquebutt, in every case where they were by law charged
with the latter.
~The lighter ammunition of the harquebus an advantage.~
In the reign of Elizabeth, the musket was so slow to charge and
discharge that the bow was considered superior by many; and Mons. de
Bellay states that if archers and cross-bowmen could carry their arrows,
&c., as easy as harquebusiers do their ammunition, he would prefer the
former weapon over the latter.
~Arrows make more severe wounds than bullets.~
The effects of arrows sticking in horses, are said to have been
frightful. This can be easily imagined. A fire-arm bullet can be shot
quite through a horse without causing the animal to show one sign of
anguish. He goes steadily on his previous course, and makes no sign.
However fatal of necessity, a fire-arm bullet gives no immediate pain.
Not so the arrow. Planted never so lightly in a horse’s neck or flank,
the animal grew furious. Starting off into a wild gallop to escape the
barbed sting, the animal had no respite for his agony. The wilder the
pace, the greater the pain. Far from the serried squadrons where he fain
would be, sore against his will, rushed the mail-clad knight. Plunging
and rearing, the steed would throw him at last, amidst the dead and
dying; himself to die.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account