Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
Buffon is the only individual that I know of, who, since the discovery
of the true system of the world, endeavoured to investigate the origin
of the planets and satellites. He supposed that a comet, by impinging
on the Sun, carried away a torrent of matter, which was reunited far
off, into globes of different magnitudes and at different distances
from this star. These globes, when they cool and become hardened,
are the planets and their satellites. This hypothesis satisfies the
first of the five preceding phenomena[22]; for it is evident that all
bodies thus formed should move very nearly in the plane which passes
through the centre of the Sun, and through the direction of the torrent
of matter which has produced them: but the four remaining phenomena
appear to me inexplicable on this supposition. Indeed, the absolute
motion of the molecules of a planet ought to be in the same direction
as the motion of the centre of gravity; but it by no means follows
from this, that the motion of rotation of a planet should be also in
the same direction. Thus the Earth may revolve from east to west, and
yet the absolute motion of each of its molecules may be directed from
west to east. This observation applies also to the revolution of the
satellites, of which the direction in the same hypothesis, is not
necessarily the same as that of the motion of projection of the planets.
The small eccentricity of the planetary orbits is a phenomenon,
not only difficult to explain on this hypothesis, but altogether
inconsistent with it. We know from the theory of central forces, that
if a body which moves in a re-entrant orbit about the Sun, passes
very near the body of the Sun, it will return constantly to it, at
the end of each revolution. Hence it follows that if the planets were
originally detached from the Sun, they would touch it, at each return
to this star; and their orbits, instead of being nearly circular,
would be very eccentric. Indeed it must be admitted that a torrent
of matter detached from the Sun, cannot be compared to a globe which
just skims by its surface; from the impulsions which the parts of this
torrent receive from each other, combined with their mutual attraction,
they may, by changing the direction of their motions, increase the
distances of their perihelions from the Sun. But their orbits should
be extremely eccentric, or at least all the orbits would not be q. p.
circular, except by the most extraordinary chance. Finally, no reason
can be assigned on the hypothesis of Buffon, why the orbits of more
than one hundred comets, which have been already observed, should be
all very eccentric. The hypothesis, therefore, is far from satisfying
the preceding phenomena. Let us consider whether we can assign the true
cause.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account