Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
Looking to the first dawn of life, when all organic beings, as we may
believe, presented the simplest structure, how, it has been asked,
could the first steps in the advancement of differentiation of parts
have arisen? Mr. Herbert Spencer would probably answer that, as soon as
simple unicellular organism came by growth or division to be compounded
of several cells, or became attached to any supporting surface, his law
“that homologous units of any order become differentiated in proportion
as their relations to incident forces become different” would come into
action. But as we have no facts to guide us, speculation on the subject
is almost useless. It is, however, an error to suppose that there would
be no struggle for existence, and, consequently, no natural selection,
until many forms had been produced; variations in a single species
inhabiting an isolated station might be beneficial, and thus the whole
mass of individuals might be modified, or two distinct forms might
arise. But, as I remarked towards the close of the Introduction, no
one ought to feel surprise at much remaining as yet unexplained on the
origin of species, if we make due allowance for our profound ignorance
on the mutual relations of the inhabitants of the world at the present
time, and still more so during past ages.
CONVERGENCE OF CHARACTER
Mr. H. C. Watson thinks that I have overrated the importance of
divergence of character (in which, however, he apparently believes),
and that convergence, as it may be called, has likewise played a
part. If two species, belonging to two distinct though allied genera,
had both produced a large number of new and divergent forms, it is
conceivable that these might approach each other so closely that they
would have all to be classed under the same genus; and thus the
descendants of two distinct genera would converge into one. But it
would in most cases be extremely rash to attribute to convergence a
close and general similarity of structure in the modified descendants
of widely distinct forms. The shape of a crystal is determined solely
by the molecular forces, and it is not surprising that dissimilar
substances should sometimes assume the same form; but with organic
beings we should bear in mind that the form of each depends on an
infinitude of complex relations, namely, on the variations which have
arisen, those being due to causes far too intricate to be followed
out,--on the nature of the variations which have been preserved or
selected, and this depends on the surrounding physical conditions, and
in a still higher degree on the surrounding organisms with which each
being has come into competition,--and lastly, on inheritance (in itself
a fluctuating element) from innumerable progenitors, all of which have
had their forms determined through equally complex relations. It is
incredible that the descendants of two organisms, which had originally
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account