Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
The spur which drove men to inquiry was sharp, and the talent of some
of the seekers must not be estimated as small. The nature of the
problem was quite calculated to entice poring brains, to lead them
round a circle for years, deceiving ever with new expectations, which
vanished upon nearer approach, and finally reducing these dupes of
hope to open insanity. The phantom could not be grasped. It would be
impossible to give a history of these efforts, as the clearer heads,
among whom the elder Droz must be ranked, convinced themselves of the
futility of their experiments, and were naturally not inclined to
speak much about them. Bewildered intellects, however, proclaimed
often enough that they had discovered the grand secret; and as the
incorrectness of their proceedings was always speedily manifest, the
matter fell into bad repute, and the opinion strengthened itself more
and more that the problem was not capable of solution; one difficulty
after another was brought under the dominion of mathematical mechanics,
and finally a point was reached where it could be proved that, at least
by the use of pure mechanical forces, no perpetual motion could be
generated.
We have here arrived at the idea of the driving force or power of
a machine, and shall have much to do with it in future. I must,
therefore, give an explanation of it. The idea of work is evidently
transferred to machines by comparing their arrangements with those of
men and animals to replace which they were applied. We still reckon
the work of steam engines according to horse-power. The value of
manual labor is determined partly by the force which is expended in
it (a strong laborer is valued more highly than a weak one), partly,
however, by the skill which is brought into action. A machine, on the
contrary, which executes work skilfully, can always be multiplied to
any extent; hence its skill has not the high value of human skill in
domains where the latter cannot be supplied by machines. Thus the idea
of the quantity of work in the case of machines has been limited to the
consideration of the expenditure of force; this was the more important,
as indeed most machines are constructed for the express purpose of
exceeding, by the magnitude of their effects, the powers of men and
animals. Hence, in a mechanical sense, the idea of work is become
identical with that of the expenditure of force, and in this way I will
apply it.
How, then, can we measure this expenditure, and compare it in the case
of different machines?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account