Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
Now it is clear that if by any means we could succeed, as the above
American professed to have done, by mechanical forces, to excite
chemical, electrical, or other natural processes, which, by any circuit
whatever, and without altering permanently the active masses in the
machine, could produce mechanical force in greater quantity than that
at first applied, a portion of the work thus gained might be made use
of to keep the machine in motion, while the rest of the work might be
applied to any other purpose whatever. The problem was, to find in
the complicated net of reciprocal actions, a track through chemical,
electrical, magnetical, and thermic processes, back to mechanical
actions, which might be followed with a final gain of mechanical work;
thus would the perpetual motion be found.
But, warned by the futility of former experiments, the public had
become wiser. On the whole, people did not seek much after combinations
which promised to furnish a perpetual motion, but the question was
inverted. It was no more asked, how can I make use of the known and
unknown relations of natural forces so as to construct a perpetual
motion? but it was asked, if a perpetual motion be impossible, what are
the relations which must subsist between natural forces? Everything
was gained by this inversion of the question. The relations of natural
forces rendered necessary by the above assumption, might be easily
and completely stated. It was found that all known relations of force
harmonize with the consequences of that assumption, and a series of
unknown relations were discovered at the same time, the correctness of
which remained to be proved. If a single one of them could be proved
false, then a perpetual motion would be possible.
The first who endeavoured to travel this way was a Frenchman, named
Carnot, in the year 1824. In spite of a too limited conception of
his subject, and an incorrect view as to the nature of heat, which
led him to some erroneous conclusions, his experiment was not quite
unsuccessful. He discovered a law which now bears his name, and to
which I will return further on.
His labors remained for a long time without notice, and it was not
till eighteen years afterwards, that is, in 1842, that different
investigators in different countries, and independent of Carnot, laid
hold of the same thought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account