Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
But I have already named two assumptions which must be made: first,
that the celestial spaces must be absolutely empty; and secondly, that
the sun and planets must be solid bodies. The first is at least the
case as far as astronomical observations reach, for they have never
been able to detect any retardation of the planets, such as would
occur if they moved in a resisting medium. But on a body of less mass,
the comet of Encke, changes are observed of such a nature: this comet
describes ellipses round the sun which are becoming gradually smaller.
If this kind of motion, which certainly corresponds to that through a
resisting medium, be actually due to the existence of such a medium,
a time will come when the comet will strike the sun; and a similar
end threatens all the planets, although after a time, the length of
which baffles our imagination to conceive of it. But even should the
existence of a resisting medium appear doubtful to us, there is no
doubt that the planets are not wholly composed of solid materials which
are inseparably bound together. Signs of the existence of an atmosphere
are observed on the Sun, on Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Signs
of water and ice upon Mars; and our earth has undoubtedly a fluid
portion on its surface, and perhaps a still greater portion of fluid
within it. The motions of the tides, however, produce friction, all
friction destroys _vis viva_, and the loss in this case can only
affect the _vis viva_ of the planetary system. We come thereby to
the unavoidable conclusion, that every tide, although with infinite
slowness, still with certainty, diminishes the store of mechanical
force of the system; and as a consequence of this, the rotation of
the planets in question round their axes must become more slow; they
must therefore approach the sun, or their satellites must approach
them. What length of time must pass before the length of our day is
diminished one second by the action of the tide cannot be calculated,
until the height and time of the tide in all portions of the ocean are
known. This alteration, however, takes place with extreme slowness,
as is known by the consequences which Laplace has deduced from the
observations of Hipparchus, according to which, during a period of
2000 years, the duration of the day has not been shortened by the
one-three-hundredth part of a second. The final consequence would be,
but after millions of years, if in the mean time the ocean did not
become frozen, that one side of the earth would be constantly turned
towards the sun, and enjoy a perpetual day, whereas the opposite side
would be involved in eternal night. Such a position we observe in our
moon with regard to the earth, and also in the case of the satellites
as regards their planets; it is, perhaps, due to the action of the
mighty ebb and flow to which these bodies, in the time of their fiery
fluid condition, were subjected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account