+----------+-------------+
| Fathoms. | Temperature.|
+----------+-------------+
| | ° |
| Surface. | 77·9 |
| 10 | 77·2 |
| 20 | 77·1 |
| 30 | 76·9 |
| 40 | 71·7 |
| 50 | 64·0 |
| 60 | 60·4 |
| 70 | 59·4 |
| 80 | 58·0 |
| 90 | 58·0 |
| 100 | 55·6 |
| 150 | 51·0 |
| 200 | 46·6 |
| 300 | 42·2 |
| 400 | 40·3 |
| 500 | 38·9 |
| 600 | 39·2 |
| 700 | 39·0 |
| 800 | 39·1 |
| 900 | 38·2 |
| 1000 | 36·9 |
| 1100 | 37·6 |
| 1200 | 36·7 |
| 1300 | 35·8 |
| 1400 | 36·4 |
| 1500 | 36·1 |
| Bottom. | 34·7 |
+----------+-------------+
We have in this Table data for determining the height at which the
surface of the ocean at the equator ought to stand above that of the
poles. Assuming 32°F. to be the temperature of the ocean at the poles
from the surface to the bottom and the foregoing to be the rate at
which the temperature of the ocean at the equator decreases from the
surface downwards, and then calculating according to Muncke’s Table of
the expansion of sea-water, we have only 4 feet 6 inches as the height
to which the level of the ocean at the equator ought to stand above
that at the poles in order that the ocean may be in static equilibrium.
In other words, the equatorial column requires to be only 4 feet 6
inches higher than the polar in order that the two may balance each
other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account