This result would have sufficed perfectly for a cosmetic tenotomy where binocular fusion did not exist; the annoyance caused to patient by diplopia, however, was only slightly relieved. I decided, therefore, on a second operation, not without fearing an excessive result, and performed tenotomy of the left internal rectus with a very small conjunctival wound and by closing the wound by means of a suture. The result was by no means excessive, for it was perfectly _nil_, apparently even negative at first, for a few days after the operation the area of single vision approached the eye to less than 0·5 m. and at 4 to 5 m. a prism of 20° was requisite for correction; however, eighteen days after the tenotomy of the left internus everything was as before. Single vision to 1 m. while prism 12° corrected for a distance of 4 to 5 m. The tenotomy then had no effect at all on the position of the eye; however, the restriction of movement dependent on it, asserted itself in that the double images were crossed on the limit of the right visual field (about 45° towards the right). On the supposition that this insufficient result might be caused by the suture of the conjunctival wound I decided to repeat the separation of the internal rectus. The agglutination of the muscle with the sclerotic is so slight for two to three weeks after the operation that the strabismus hook perfectly suffices to sever the connection; no suture was put in, but the result again was _nil_, and on the day after the operation single vision was only present to 0·5 m. in the middle line, just as after the previous tenotomy of the left internal rectus. It was now clear that the result with respect to the position of the eye was only unsuccessful because the antagonist did not do its duty. I shortened the abducens (without touching the internus again). The immediate effect, during the chloroform narcosis, was a terrible divergence, but on the same evening it was less, and twenty-four hours after the operation with a red glass, homonymous double images were present close together at a distance of 4 m. Ten days afterwards binocular single vision was insured, facultative divergence = 3° at 4 m., crossed double images towards the limits of both visual fields, but only on moving the eyes in a lateral direction; no practical use was made of this. If one could have diagnosed beforehand the insufficiency of the externi assuredly present here, which was probably the reason for the development of squint on the healing of the paralysis of the abducens, one would have been able to combine shortening of the right abducens with tenotomy of the internus in the first operation, whereas the necessity for the advancement was only shown by the abnormally slight effect of the tenotomy on the left side. According to accounts received by letter the favorable result has continued. We obtain a result more quickly by the immediate advancement of the abducens. For example: