Very fortunately for science, we have similar examples of imperfect
expression in the living. Thus Dr. Gibotteau, formerly interne at a
hospital in Paris, published, in Annales des Sciences, Psychiques
(Oct. and Dec, 1892), his experiments on a hospital nurse, and her
experiments on him. She used to try to send him hallucinations.
Once at 8 p.m. in summer as he stood on a balcony, he saw a curious
reflet blanc, 'a shining shadow' like that in The Strange Story. It
resembled the reflection of the sun from a window, 'but there was
neither sun, nor moon, nor lighted lamps'. This white shadow was
the partial failure of Berthe, the nurse, 'to show herself to me on
the balcony'. In precisely the same way, lights in haunted houses
are partial failures of ghosts to appear in form As for the knocks,
Dr. Binns, in his Anatomy of Sleep, mentions a gentleman who could
push a door at a distance,--if he could push, he could knock.
Perhaps a rather larger collection of such instances is desirable,
still, these cases illustrate our theory. That theory certainly
does drive the cold calm psychical researcher back upon the
primitive explanation: 'A ghaist's a ghaist for a' that!' We must
come to this, we must relapse into savage and superstitious
psychology, if once we admit a 'phantasmogenetic agency.' But
science is in quest of Truth, regardless of consequences.
COCK LANE AND COMMON-SENSE
Cock Lane Ghost discredited. Popular Theory of Imposture. Dr.
Johnson. Story of the Ghost. The Deceased Wife's Sister.
Beginning of the Phenomena. Death of Fanny. Recurrence of
Phenomena. Scratchings. Parallel Cases. Ignorance and Malevolence
of the Ghost. Possible Literary Sources. Investigation. Imitative
Scratchings: a Failure. Trial of the Parsonses. Professor
Barrett's Irish parallel. Cause undetected. The Theories of
Common-sense. The St. Maur Affair. The Amiens Case. The Sportive
Highland Fox. The Brightling Case.
If one phantom is more discredited than another, it is the Cock Lane
ghost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account