Christian fiction; Conduct of life -- Fiction; Didactic fiction; Mate selection -- Fiction
"It were well," said Dr. Barlow, "if the evil ended here. The
established Christian will evince himself to be such by not shrinking
from the attack. But the misfortune is, that the dread of this attack
keeps back well disposed but vacillating characters. They are
intimidated at the idea of partaking the censure, though they know it to
be false. When they hear the reputation of men of piety assailed, they
assume an indifference which they are far from feeling. They listen to
the reproaches cast on characters which they inwardly revere, without
daring to vindicate them. They hear the most attached subjects accused
of disaffection, and the most sober-minded churchmen of innovation,
without venturing to repel the charge, lest they should be suspected of
leaning to the party. They are afraid fully to avow that their own
principles are the same, lest they should be involved in the same
calumny. To efface this suspicion, they affect a coldness which they do
not feel, and treat with levity what they inwardly venerate. Very young
men, from this criminal timidity, are led to risk their eternal
happiness through the dread of a laugh. Though they know that they have
not only religion but reason on their side, yet it requires a hardy
virtue to repel a sneer, and an intrepid principle to confront a
sarcasm. Thus their own mind loses its firmness, religion loses their
support, the world loses the benefit which their example would afford,
and they themselves become liable to the awful charge which is denounced
against him who is ashamed of his Christian profession."
"Men of the world," said Sir John, "are extremely jealous of whatever
may be thought _particular_; they are frightened at every thing that has
not the sanction of public opinion, and the stamp of public applause.
They are impatient of the slightest suspicion of censure in what may be
supposed to affect the credit of their judgment, though often
indifferent enough as to any blame that may attach to their conduct.
They have been accustomed to consider strict religion as a thing which
militates against good taste, and to connect the idea of something
unclassical and inelegant, something awkward and unpopular, something
uncouth and ill-bred, with the peculiar doctrines of Christianity;
doctrines which, though there is no harm in believing, they think there
can be no good in avowing."
"It is a little hard," said Mr. Stanley, "that men of piety, who are
allowed to possess good sense on all other occasions, and whose judgment
is respected in all the ordinary concerns of life, should not have a
little credit given them in matters of religion, but that they should be
at once transformed into idiots or madmen in that very point which
affords the noblest exercise to the human faculties."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account