New York (State) -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; New York (State) -- Social life and customs -- To 1775
The notary Walewyn van der Veen was frequently in trouble, usually for
contempt of court. And I doubt not “the little bench of justices” was
sometimes rather trying in its ways to a notary who knew anything about
law. On one occasion, when a case relating to a bill of exchange had
been decided against him, Van der Veen spoke of their High Mightinesses
the magistrates as “simpletons and blockheads.” This was the scathing
sentence of his punishment:--
“That Walewyn Van der Veen, for his committed insult, shall here beg
forgiveness, with uncovered head, of God, Justice, and the Worshipful
Court, and moreover pay as a fine 190 guilders.”
This fine must have consumed all his fees for many a weary month
thereafter, if we can judge by the meagre lawyers’ bills which have
come down to us.
Another time the contumacious Van der Veen called the Secretary a
rascal. Thereat, the latter, much aggrieved, demanded “honorable and
profitable reparation” for the insult. The _schout_ judged this epithet
to be a slander and an affront to the Secretary, which “affected his
honor, being tender,” and the honor of the Court as well, since it was
to a member of the Court, and he demanded that the notary should pay
a fine of fifty guilders as an example to other slanderers, “who for
trifles have constantly in their mouths curses and abuses of other
honorable people.”
Another well-known notary and practitioner and pleader in the busy
little Court held in the Stadt Huys was Solomon La Chair. His
manuscript volume of nearly three hundred pages, containing detailed
accounts of all the business he transacted in Manhattan, is now in the
County Clerk’s Office in New York, and proves valuable material for the
historiographer. He had much business, for he could speak and write
both English and Dutch; and he was a faithful, painstaking, intelligent
worker. He not only conducted lawsuits for others, but he seems to
have been in constant legal hot water himself on his own account. He
was sued for drinking and not paying for a can of sugared wine; and
also for a half-aam of costly French wine; and he was sued for the
balance of payment for a house he had purchased; he pleaded for more
time, and with the ingenuous guilelessness peculiar to the law said in
explanation that he had had the money gathered at one time for payment,
but it had somehow dropped through his fingers. “The Court condemned to
pay at once,”--not being taken in by any such simplicity as that. He
had to pay a fine of twelve guilders for affronting both fire inspector
and court messenger. He first insulted the _brandt-meester_ who came to
inspect his chimney, and was fined, then he called the _bode_ who came
to collect the fine “a little cock booted and spurred.” The Court in
sentence said with dignity, “It is not meet that men should mock and
scoff at persons appointed to any office, yea a necessary office.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account