New York (State) -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; New York (State) -- Social life and customs -- To 1775
A very early mention of a maypole is in June, 1645, when one William
Garritse had “sung a libellous song” against Rev. Francis Doughty, the
preacher at Flushing, Long Island, and was sentenced in punishment
therefor to be tied to the maypole, which in June was still standing.
Stuyvesant again forbade “drunken drinking,” and firing of guns and
planting of maypoles, as productive of bad practices. I don’t know
whether the delight of my childhood, and of generations of children
in Old and New England up to this present May Day on which I am now
writing,--the hanging of May baskets,--ever made happy children in New
York.
There was some observance in New York of Shrovetide as a holiday-time.
As early as 1657 we find the sober Beverwyck burghers deliberating
on “some improprieties committed at the house of Albert de Timmerman
on Shrovetide last.” As was the inevitable custom followed by the
extremely uninventive brain of the seventeenth and eighteenth century
rioter, were he Dutch or English, these “improprieties” took the
form of the men’s parading in women’s clothes; Pieter Semiensen
was one of the masqueraders. Two years later the magistrates were
again investigating the “unseemly and scandalous” celebration of
Shrovetide; and as ever before, the youth of early Albany donned
women’s clothes and “marched as mountebanks,” as the record says, just
as they did in Philadelphia and Baltimore and even in sober Boston.
We find also for sale in Beverwyck at this time, noisy Shrovetide
toys--_rommelerytiens_, little “rumbling-pots,” which the youth and
children doubtless keenly enjoyed.
At an early date Shrovetide observances, such as “pulling the goose,”
were prohibited by Governor Stuyvesant in New York. A mild protest
on the part of some of the burgomasters against this order of the
Governor brought forth one of Stuyvesant’s characteristically choleric
edicts in answer, in which he speaks of having “interdicted and
forbidden certain farmers’ servants to ride the goose at the feast
of Backus and Shrovetide ... because it is altogether unprofitable,
unnecessary, and criminal for subjects and neighbors to celebrate such
pagan and popish feasts and to practise such customs, notwithstanding
the same may in some places of Fatherland be tolerated and looked at
through the fingers.” Domine Blom, of Kingston or Wyltwyck, joined
in the governor’s dislike of the game. But there were some of the
magistrates who liked very well to “pull the goose” themselves, so
it is said. It was a cruel amusement. The thoroughly greased goose
was hung between two poles, and the effort of the sport was to catch,
snatch away, and hold fast the poor creature while passing at great
speed. In Albany in 1677 all “Shrovetide misdemeanors were prohibited,
viz.: riding at a goose, cat, hare, and ale.” The fine was twenty-five
guilders in sea-want. What the cat, hare, and ale part of the sport
was, I do not know.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account