Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal InstitutionAbney, William de Wiveleslie, Sir
Science
Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal Institution
Abney, William de Wiveleslie, Sir
Color vision
of the two indicates the difference in sensitiveness for each part of
the spectrum.
[Illustration: FIG. 39.]
Her persistency curve as calculated occupies the same position and is
of about the same dimensions, when the maximum is made 100, as that of
the normal eye, as it is therefore of red- and green-blind, and also
of the two cases of monochromatic vision. We have in Miss W. a type of
colour blindness which no present theory of colour vision accounts for
without straining; and it would probably have to refer it to the seat
of sensation rather than to the retina alone.
[Illustration: FIG. 40.
The thin line curve is the curve of luminosity for the normal eye.]
The second is a case of congenital colour blindness and with no trace
of disease, brought by Mr. Nettleship to the same Committee. He found
that this lady, N. W., mistook blue for red, and it was with some
curiosity that this case was examined. Her first examination was as to
colour sense with the spectrum colours, a patch of monochromatic light
being placed in juxtaposition with an equal patch of white light. At
62·5 (λ 6890) of the scale the light of the spectrum disappeared. As
the slit moved along the spectrum, and the white was approximately
reduced to equal luminosity, she described all the red as grey, and
of the same colour as the white until 53·5 (λ 6110). At this point
she said the colour was brownish compared with the white, and this
hue continued to her till 48 on the scale (λ 5720), when she said the
colour was “neither brown nor green, but both.” From 48 on the scale
she described the colour as green, when it changed quite suddenly at
31·5 (λ 4905). From this point and in the blue she again began to see
grey; the grey at this end of the spectrum, and also of the white
patch, she called brownish-grey. This name must evidently have been a
mental distinction, as she described the red end and the white as grey
only, and not brownish-grey; and, indeed, she was tested again over
that part of the spectrum, and adhered to the previous naming. It would
appear to be due to low luminosity, which made the grey appear to her
what she called brownish, rather than to any actual difference in hue.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account